Texas House Bill HB2830

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/10/11

Caption

Relating to the development of a model individualized education program form by the Texas Education Agency.

Impact

If enacted, HB2830 will significantly impact IEP documentation processes in Texas by standardizing the information that can be included in these documents. The TEA is mandated to develop this model form, which school districts will use to satisfy federal IEP requirements. This move is intended to facilitate a smoother administrative process and ensure compliance with federal standards while reducing the complexity often associated with individualized education programs.

Summary

House Bill 2830 relates to the development of a model individualized education program (IEP) form by the Texas Education Agency (TEA). The bill amends the Education Code to ensure that the written IEP will include only information outlined in the new model form. This form must be clear, concise, and easily understandable for both parents and educators, thereby enhancing clarity in the communication of educational needs for students requiring special education services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2830 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among educational stakeholders who advocate for clearer and more structured IEP documentation. Supporters believe that standardizing the IEP process will lead to better outcomes for students with disabilities as it facilitates greater understanding and involvement from parents. Opposition may arise from those concerned about the flexibility of IEPs being compromised, though specific dissenting viewpoints were not highlighted in the available documents.

Contention

A notable point of contention with HB2830 could stem from the concerns regarding the potential loss of individualized components in the IEP process. While the bill aims to create a standardized model, critics may argue that such uniformity could overlook unique student needs that require tailored educational strategies. As stakeholders in the education system weigh the benefits of clarity against the importance of customization in special education, the bill could face scrutiny during discussions and debates.