Texas House Bill HB2922

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/10/11
• Refer: 3/17/11

Caption

Relating to the refund of excessively or unfairly discriminatory premiums paid for certain personal lines of insurance.

Impact

The introduction of HB2922 is expected to significantly enhance consumer protection within the state's insurance market. By mandating that insurers follow stricter guidelines when dealing with unfair premium charges, the bill seeks to reduce discriminatory pricing practices that may adversely affect policyholders. The need for insurers to maintain compliance with these new rules could lead to more conscientious business practices in the industry, ultimately benefitting consumers who may have faced unjust rates in the past.

Summary

House Bill 2922 focuses on ensuring that policyholders receive refunds for excessively or unfairly discriminatory premiums charged by insurance companies for certain personal lines of insurance. This bill amends the Texas Insurance Code to introduce requirements for insurers when they do not comply with refund guidelines. Notably, if an insurer files a petition for judicial review but fails to refund premiums deemed unfairly discriminatory, it must either deposit a substantial amount or file a motion for exemption. These finance-related provisions are aimed at holding insurers accountable for their pricing practices.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB2922 appears to be predominantly supportive among consumer advocates, who view the legislation as a necessary step toward safeguarding consumers against predatory pricing practices in the insurance sector. However, there are concerns from some industry representatives about the potential for increased operational costs resulting from the requirement to hold monetary deposits or bonds during judicial proceedings. This divide highlights a tension between the protective measures for consumers and the operational implications for insurance providers.

Contention

While the overall aim of HB2922 is to protect consumers, there are notable points of contention in discussions surrounding its implementation. Critics argue that the financial burden imposed on insurers to post deposits or bonds could ultimately be passed on to consumers in the form of higher premiums. Additionally, some industry stakeholders believe that the bill may introduce regulatory complexities that could hinder their capacity to operate effectively. Balancing the need for consumer protections with maintaining a viable insurance market will be essential as the bill progresses through the legislature.