Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB295

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to certification for placement on the ballot of candidates for president or vice-president of the United States.

Impact

If enacted, HB295 would amend the Election Code, particularly Section 192.033, establishing stricter criteria for ballot certification. This could subsequently alter the process by which candidates qualify for the election, potentially impacting the political landscape in Texas. By requiring birth certificates from candidates, the bill could diminish the number of individuals eligible to run, particularly affecting those with non-traditional circumstances regarding their citizenship documentation.

Summary

House Bill 295 addresses the certification requirements for the placement of presidential and vice-presidential candidates on the ballot in Texas. The bill mandates that the secretary of state may only certify candidates who provide an original birth certificate proving their status as natural-born United States citizens. This legislative change aims to ensure that all candidates meet this specific criterion, thereby reinforcing the constitutional requirements related to presidential eligibility.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB295 is likely mixed, with supporters viewing it as a necessary step to uphold constitutional standards and ensure the integrity of electoral processes. However, detractors may argue that it unnecessarily complicates the candidate certification process and could serve as a barrier to entry for qualified individuals, fostering skepticism about its motivations. The debate reflects broader themes of citizenship and electoral integrity that are significant in contemporary discussions about election laws.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB295 center around the implications of requiring documentation that some may find difficult to obtain. Critics may express concerns that such a requirement could lead to disenfranchisement or unjust exclusion of legitimate candidates. Additionally, there could be arguments regarding whether this measure is a solution to a problem that may not exist, raising questions about the necessity and efficacy of such stringent certification requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.