Relating to the remediation of underground storage tanks and the fee on delivery of certain petroleum products.
Impact
The implementation of HB 2984 would modify existing state laws governing environmental remediation. It delineates the responsibilities of storage tank operators to take immediate corrective actions upon the potential threats of leaks, thereby increasing the rigor of compliance with safety standards. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is granted enhanced authority to direct remediation efforts when liable parties fail to respond adequately to releases. By instituting a fee structure based on the delivery of petroleum products, the bill also aims to fund these critical environmental protection measures.
Summary
House Bill 2984 aims to enhance the regulation and remediation processes concerning underground storage tanks (USTs) and establish fees related to the delivery of petroleum products. The bill proposes amendments to the Water Code, introducing clearer definitions and responsibilities for the owners and operators of USTs. Notably, it defines 'potential release' as a condition that could lead to environmental damage, thereby necessitating proactive measures for prevention and mitigation. The proposed changes are intended to strengthen public health protections and safeguard the environment against contaminated sites arising from improper storage and handling of petroleum.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 2984 appears to be largely positive among environmental advocacy groups who view it as a necessary step toward more sustainable management of underground storage tanks. Supporters assert that the bill will mitigate risks linked to environmental contamination and align with broader public health objectives. However, skepticism exists among some industry stakeholders who worry about the financial implications imposed by the newly established fees and increased regulatory burdens that could affect operational costs.
Contention
Despite the overall support for enhanced environmental protections, several points of contention arise from the bill's provisions. Critics argue that the imposition of additional fees may disproportionately burden small operators and could lead to increased costs for consumers. Furthermore, there is apprehension regarding the enforcement capabilities of the TCEQ, particularly whether it will have sufficient resources to effectively oversee the increased regulatory responsibilities stipulated in the bill. Addressing these concerns is crucial for balancing robust environmental safeguards with the economic realities faced by petroleum product suppliers.
Relating to the ownership of the pore space underlying the surface of land and to the use of that space for the geologic storage of carbon dioxide; authorizing a fee.
Relating to the regulation of certain aggregate production operations by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality; authorizing an increase in the amount of a fee.
Relating to planning and financial responsibility requirements for certain aggregate production operations; providing for the imposition of an administrative penalty.
Relating to authorizing the possession, use, cultivation, distribution, delivery, sale, and research of medical cannabis for medical use by patients with certain medical conditions and the licensing of medical cannabis organizations; authorizing fees.