Texas House Bill HB315

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Filed: 11/18/10
• Out of House Committee: 3/11/11
• Introduced: 11/18/10
• Voted on by House: 3/30/11
• Refer: 2/15/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/6/11
• Report Pass: 3/8/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/17/11
• Engrossed: 3/30/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Enrolled: 5/18/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Hunt County Municipal Utility District No. 1; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

Impact

The bill aims to enhance local governance by allowing the district to finance and manage necessary projects such as water and wastewater facilities, as well as road construction and maintenance. The proposed funding mechanisms include the ability to levy taxes and issue bonds, which could provide significant resources for infrastructure improvements. It also seeks to facilitate economic development in Hunt County by ensuring that essential services and utilities are available to support population growth and business activity.

Summary

House Bill 315 establishes the Hunt County Municipal Utility District No. 1, providing the new district with the authority to impose taxes, issue bonds, and grant a limited power of eminent domain. The creation of this district is framed within the context of improving local infrastructure, such as road projects and utility services, to support the growth and development of the area. It addresses the need for a structured governance model, which is to be managed by a board of five directors elected from within the district's jurisdiction.

Contention

A notable point of contention in the discussions surrounding HB 315 involves the district's authority concerning eminent domain. The bill specifies that the exercise of this power is limited and requires a two-thirds vote from the district's elected officials for such authority to be granted. Opponents express concern over potential abuse of this power and the implications for landowners within the district. The specific governance structure and financial mechanisms set forth in the bill also present points of debate, particularly regarding accountability and the potential financial burden on residents through taxes.