Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB3225

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the renewal of a deferred presentment transaction.

Impact

The bill amends existing finance code to define 'lenders' and stipulate clear rules regarding the renewal of deferred presentment transactions. The intended effect is to protect consumers from accruing unmanageable debt through the continual renewal of loans. It is expected to change the practices of lenders in Texas, enforcing a stricter repayment timeline that could lead to better financial outcomes for borrowers. The legislation is applicable only to transactions entered into after its effective date, thus protecting those who have already engaged in these loans prior to amendments.

Summary

House Bill 3225 addresses the regulation of deferred presentment transactions, commonly known as payday loans. This legislation introduces limitations on how often these loans can be renewed, allowing a maximum of four consecutive renewals. After the fourth renewal, borrowers are required to pay off the debt in full, either in cash or its equivalent. This measure aims to curb the cycle of debt that often ensnares borrowers who rely on these short-term loans and find themselves renewing them multiple times without paying down the principal amount.

Sentiment

Reactions to HB3225 seem to be generally positive among consumer protection advocates, who perceive the bill as a necessary step to provide borrowers with fairer lending terms. They highlight the dangers associated with excessive renewals leading to a debt trap for many Texans. Conversely, there may be some concerns from lenders who argue that these restrictions could limit their business operations and reduce access to credit for those who use payday loans as a financial resource.

Contention

There are notable points of contention surrounding HB3225, particularly regarding its implications for lenders and their business models. Some opponents of the bill may assert that limiting renewals could cut off critical financial resources for individuals facing emergencies. This concern raises questions about the balance between consumer protection and access to short-term credit. The legislative discussions emphasize the ongoing tension between the need for regulation in the finance sector and the goal of maintaining availability of financial services for consumers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.