Relating to the fee on delivery of certain petroleum products.
Impact
Should HB3420 be enacted, it will directly influence the operations of bulk petroleum facilities across the state. By specifying fees for different cargo tank capacities, the law intends to standardize the costs associated with the withdrawal of petroleum products from bulk storage facilities. This could lead to increased revenue for the state, which might be used to support regulatory oversight and environmental initiatives related to petroleum handling.
Summary
House Bill 3420 proposes amendments to the Water Code specifically concerning the fee imposed on the delivery of petroleum products from bulk storage facilities. The bill outlines a fee structure based on the delivery size into cargo tanks, establishing rates that vary depending on the tank's capacity. The changes aim to adjust existing regulations to better facilitate the management and environmental oversight of petroleum product deliveries in Texas, ensuring compliance with state safety protocols.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB3420 appears to be generally supportive, especially among stakeholders interested in enhanced regulatory frameworks for petroleum product management. Industry representatives might advocate for clarity in fee structures which can aid in budgeting and compliance. However, discussions around the bill may also reflect concerns from environmental groups who urge for additional protective measures against possible environmental impacts from petroleum spills during delivery.
Contention
While not specified in the provided documents, potential points of contention around HB3420 could include the adequacy of the proposed fees in dealing with environmental risks associated with petroleum deliveries. Stakeholders might debate whether the rates sufficiently capture the cost of potential damages or regulatory enforcement needed to protect local ecosystems. Moreover, the implications of these fees on small operators versus larger bulk facilities might stir discussions on fair practices and regulatory burdens.
Relating to state and municipal motor fuel taxes; providing civil penalties; creating criminal offenses; requiring occupational licenses; authorizing the imposition of taxes; providing for increases and decreases in the rates of taxes.
Relating to the equalization of the rates of production fees charged on certain wells by the Barton Springs-Edwards Aquifer Conservation District; authorizing an increase in the rate of the fee.
Relating to the production and regulation of hemp; providing an administrative penalty; requiring a permit to conduct certain research involving hemp; authorizing a fee; creating a criminal offense.
Relating to the regulation of certain aggregate production operations by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality; authorizing an increase in the amount of a fee.