Texas House Bill HB3420

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Caption

Relating to the fee on delivery of certain petroleum products.

Impact

Should HB3420 be enacted, it will directly influence the operations of bulk petroleum facilities across the state. By specifying fees for different cargo tank capacities, the law intends to standardize the costs associated with the withdrawal of petroleum products from bulk storage facilities. This could lead to increased revenue for the state, which might be used to support regulatory oversight and environmental initiatives related to petroleum handling.

Summary

House Bill 3420 proposes amendments to the Water Code specifically concerning the fee imposed on the delivery of petroleum products from bulk storage facilities. The bill outlines a fee structure based on the delivery size into cargo tanks, establishing rates that vary depending on the tank's capacity. The changes aim to adjust existing regulations to better facilitate the management and environmental oversight of petroleum product deliveries in Texas, ensuring compliance with state safety protocols.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB3420 appears to be generally supportive, especially among stakeholders interested in enhanced regulatory frameworks for petroleum product management. Industry representatives might advocate for clarity in fee structures which can aid in budgeting and compliance. However, discussions around the bill may also reflect concerns from environmental groups who urge for additional protective measures against possible environmental impacts from petroleum spills during delivery.

Contention

While not specified in the provided documents, potential points of contention around HB3420 could include the adequacy of the proposed fees in dealing with environmental risks associated with petroleum deliveries. Stakeholders might debate whether the rates sufficiently capture the cost of potential damages or regulatory enforcement needed to protect local ecosystems. Moreover, the implications of these fees on small operators versus larger bulk facilities might stir discussions on fair practices and regulatory burdens.