Texas House Bill HB3470

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/11/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/18/11
• Voted on by House: 4/27/11
• Refer: 3/18/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/12/11
• Report Pass: 4/14/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/19/11
• Engrossed: 4/27/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/3/11
• Report Pass: 5/12/11
• Enrolled: 5/21/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the Texas Armed Services Scholarship Program.

Impact

The bill modifies provisions within the Education Code related to higher education funding and military service scholarships. It specifies that students under this program must complete four years of ROTC training and make a four-year commitment to military service after graduation or face repayment obligations for the scholarship received. By enforcing these stipulations, the bill aims to encourage a pathway to military service for graduates while also addressing gaps in current educational funding mechanisms tied to military programs.

Summary

House Bill 3470 pertains to the Texas Armed Services Scholarship Program, outlining amendments to the existing eligibility criteria and requirements for receiving scholarships linked to military service. The bill aims to enhance the support for students enrolled in Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) programs by establishing clearer guidelines for scholarship recipients. Specifically, it mandates that students must be in good standing with an ROTC program and imposes obligations relating to military service upon graduation, ensuring that recipients commit to serving in various branches of the military.

Contention

Discussions surrounding this bill may include points of contention regarding the balance between educational support and military obligations. Some stakeholders may argue that while supporting military service is essential, equating education funding to mandatory service could limit opportunities for students who may wish to pursue different career paths. Additionally, concerns may arise about the repayment requirements and the implications for students who do not complete the terms of their scholarship agreements. Such conditions may lead to debates on the fairness and accessibility of the scholarship program, particularly for those from diverse backgrounds.