Relating to authorizing counties to adopt buffer zone regulations and comprehensive plans and assess a roadway cost recovery fee; providing a penalty.
Impact
Should HB 3492 be enacted, it would lead to significant changes in how counties manage land development and the associated infrastructure costs. The bill empowers counties to adopt comprehensive plans and establishes a formal process for assessing and collecting roadway cost recovery fees, thereby creating a structured approach to managing the impact of new developments on county resources. This could potentially make it easier for counties to fund improvements in their infrastructure, such as roads and public facilities necessary to support population growth and urban development.
Summary
House Bill 3492 aims to give counties in Texas the authority to establish buffer zone regulations and implement a roadway cost recovery fee that targets new developments. The bill defines these regulations and fees in terms of the impact such developments have on county infrastructure, allowing commissioners courts to assess fees on new developments to recover infrastructure costs. This legislative act is designed to streamline county planning procedures and to ensure that new developments contribute to necessary infrastructure improvements.
Sentiment
Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 3492 is mixed. Proponents, including many local government officials, view the bill as a necessary step toward improved infrastructure funding and more efficient planning practices. They argue that such regulatory measures could alleviate the financial burdens on counties forced to accommodate rapid development without sufficient resources. Conversely, there are concerns expressed by some community advocates regarding the impact of these fees on affordability and the possibility of overregulation in land development practices.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the balance between economic development and community impact, particularly how buffer zone regulations might affect existing properties and industrial uses. Critics argue that while the intention is to protect public health and safety, the implementation of such regulations may lead to restrictions that could hinder development opportunities for new businesses in rural areas. Furthermore, there are worries regarding the potential for increased costs for developers that could ultimately be passed on to residents.
Relating to the creation of the Dallas Municipal Management District; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments and fees.
Relating to the creation of the Dallas Municipal Management District; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments and fees.
Relating to the regulation and voluntary licensing of reroofing contractors by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation; providing administrative and civil penalties; authorizing fees.
Relating to the regulation of sports wagering; requiring occupational permits; authorizing fees; imposing a tax; decriminalizing wagering on certain sports events; creating criminal offenses; providing administrative penalties.
Relating to the regulation of sports wagering; requiring occupational permits; authorizing fees; imposing a tax; decriminalizing wagering on certain sports events; creating criminal offenses; providing administrative penalties.
Relating to the creation of the Presidio International Port Authority District; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.
Relating to the creation of the Presidio International Port Authority District; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.
Relating to defenses to prosecution of the criminal offenses of gambling, keeping a gambling place, and possession of a gambling device, equipment, or paraphernalia and county regulation of poker clubs; providing civil penalties; authorizing an occupational license; authorizing a fee; creating a criminal offense.