Texas House Bill HB3492

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/11/11
• Refer: 3/18/11

Caption

Relating to authorizing counties to adopt buffer zone regulations and comprehensive plans and assess a roadway cost recovery fee; providing a penalty.

Impact

Should HB 3492 be enacted, it would lead to significant changes in how counties manage land development and the associated infrastructure costs. The bill empowers counties to adopt comprehensive plans and establishes a formal process for assessing and collecting roadway cost recovery fees, thereby creating a structured approach to managing the impact of new developments on county resources. This could potentially make it easier for counties to fund improvements in their infrastructure, such as roads and public facilities necessary to support population growth and urban development.

Summary

House Bill 3492 aims to give counties in Texas the authority to establish buffer zone regulations and implement a roadway cost recovery fee that targets new developments. The bill defines these regulations and fees in terms of the impact such developments have on county infrastructure, allowing commissioners courts to assess fees on new developments to recover infrastructure costs. This legislative act is designed to streamline county planning procedures and to ensure that new developments contribute to necessary infrastructure improvements.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 3492 is mixed. Proponents, including many local government officials, view the bill as a necessary step toward improved infrastructure funding and more efficient planning practices. They argue that such regulatory measures could alleviate the financial burdens on counties forced to accommodate rapid development without sufficient resources. Conversely, there are concerns expressed by some community advocates regarding the impact of these fees on affordability and the possibility of overregulation in land development practices.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between economic development and community impact, particularly how buffer zone regulations might affect existing properties and industrial uses. Critics argue that while the intention is to protect public health and safety, the implementation of such regulations may lead to restrictions that could hinder development opportunities for new businesses in rural areas. Furthermore, there are worries regarding the potential for increased costs for developers that could ultimately be passed on to residents.