Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB3623

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the environmental review of certain transportation projects by the Texas Department of Transportation.

Impact

The implementation of HB 3623 is expected to streamline the environmental review process, which may lead to faster project approvals. By creating specific standards and assigning responsibilities for reviewing transportation projects, the bill seeks to minimize delays caused by the current procedural inefficiencies. If successful, this could result in timely completion of transportation projects, which is crucial for state infrastructure development. However, some may view this standardization as potentially overlooking specific local environmental concerns, which could arise from a more generalized review process.

Summary

House Bill 3623 aims to enhance the environmental review process for transportation projects managed by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). The bill establishes a structured certification process for environmental specialists, public involvement specialists, engineers, and attorneys involved in the environmental review documents for state and federal transportation projects. The intention is to create a more efficient review process, ensuring that only qualified personnel handle these critical environmental assessments. The bill dictates that ongoing education will be required to maintain certification, emphasizing the importance of keeping up with evolving environmental standards and regulations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 3623 is largely supportive among stakeholders who prioritize efficient infrastructure development and believe that qualified professionals should oversee important environmental evaluations. Proponents argue that the bill will facilitate smoother project execution while ensuring environmental compliance. Conversely, opponents express concern that the focus on efficiency may compromise the thoroughness of environmental assessments, thereby potentially neglecting unique local ecological factors that might not be adequately addressed in standardized processes.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions around HB 3623 include the balance between expediency and thorough environmental consideration. Critics highlight the risk that fast-tracking the review process might diminish the quality and attention given to local environmental issues. They argue that while it is essential to support transportation development, it should not come at the expense of rigorous environmental oversight. Ultimately, the enactment of this bill will closely shape the relationship between transportation development and environmental stewardship in Texas.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX SB548

Relating to the environmental review process for transportation projects.

TX HB630

Relating to the environmental review process for transportation projects.

CA AB2731

California Environmental Quality Act: City of San Diego: Old Town Center redevelopment.

CA AB734

California Environmental Quality Act: Oakland Sports and Mixed-Use Project.

TX SB1420

Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Department of Transportation; providing penalties.

TX HB3742

Relating to the environmental review of certain transportation projects by the Texas Department of Transportation

IL SB1680

TRANSPORTATION-GREENHOUSE GAS

IL HB5825

TRANSPORTATION-GREENHOUSE GAS