Texas House Bill HB3706

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/27/11
• Introduced: 3/11/11
• Refer: 3/23/11
• Report Pass: 4/14/11

Caption

Relating to measures in anticipation of federal legislation that would recognize the sovereignty of the states by providing each state with autonomy in determining whether and to what extent certain federal programs or mandates would apply in that state.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would create a new chapter in the Government Code that facilitates the formation of a state sovereignty oversight work group. This group would consist of members from both legislative houses, tasked with monitoring federal legislation that aligns with the intent of this bill. The work group will analyze the potential effects of such legislation on the state and recommend necessary changes to state law to ensure effective implementation of any granted rights and authority under new federal programs.

Summary

House Bill 3706 aims to prepare for potential changes in federal legislation that would enhance state sovereignty by allowing states more autonomy in deciding how federal programs and mandates apply to them. The bill proposes a framework whereby Texas would examine its rights under new federal laws, especially those that could impact participation in federal grant programs. It emphasizes the need for the state to have the ability to choose whether to participate in federal programs that impose specific requirements, reflecting a growing sentiment toward local governance and regulatory independence.

Contention

Notably, the bill's proponents argue that it safeguards Texas’s rights in the face of increasing federal authority. They view it as a proactive measure that empowers the state to maintain control over its affairs and ensures that any future federal laws do not infringe upon state autonomy. However, it may invite contention from those who believe that such measures could hinder beneficial federal assistance, especially in programs that rely on state compliance to federal standards, leading to debates about the balance between state rights and federal governance.