Texas House Bill HB3852

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 5/3/11
• Voted on by House: 5/13/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/21/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/24/11
• Engrossed: 5/13/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/13/11
• Report Pass: 5/21/11
• Enrolled: 5/25/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Midlothian Municipal Management District No. 2; providing authority to impose a tax, levy an assessment, and issue bonds.

Impact

The legislation outlines a framework for the district's operations, including the requirement for a development agreement and finance plan to be executed before any district powers can be exercised. This measure is intended to ensure accountability and alignment with local governance, as all improvements undertaken must benefit the district and comply with city regulations. The district's financial mechanisms, such as the ability to impose ad valorem taxes and issue bonds, provide the necessary funding for public works and infrastructure improvements, thereby potentially enhancing the local economy and quality of life for residents.

Summary

House Bill 3852 establishes the Midlothian Municipal Management District No. 2, which aims to oversee and facilitate local improvements and developments within a defined jurisdiction in Midlothian, Texas. This special district is empowered to impose taxes, levy assessments, and issue bonds to finance various improvement projects that promote economic development, enhance public welfare, and support urban planning initiatives. The creation of this district reflects an effort to centralize management and funding for improvements that benefit the local community in terms of infrastructure and public services.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 3852 include concerns about the balance of local government powers versus the district's autonomy. While proponents argue that streamlining improvements through a special district can lead to more efficient public service delivery and economic growth, opponents may raise issues about transparency, local governance, and the potential for increased taxation. Additionally, debates may arise surrounding the implications of funding mechanisms and the long-term sustainability of such a district regarding maintenance and operational costs after its formation.