Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB446 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                            82R3749 SJM-D
 By: Guillen H.B. No. 446


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to discovery in a criminal case and the consequences of a
 failure to disclose certain discoverable evidence in a timely
 manner.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Article 39.14, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
 amended by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsections (a-1),
 (c), (d), and (e) to read as follows:
 (a)  Not later than the 30th day after the date an
 information or indictment is filed in a criminal action [Upon
 motion of the defendant showing good cause therefor and upon notice
 to the other parties], except as provided by Article 39.15, the
 court in which the [an] action is pending shall order the State
 [before or during trial of a criminal action therein pending or on
 trial] to produce and permit defense counsel to inspect [the
 inspection] and, on the condition that defense counsel is
 prohibited from further reproduction by or dissemination to a
 person other than an agent of the attorney, to copy [copying] or
 photograph [photographing by or on behalf of the defendant of] any
 designated documents, papers, reports by law enforcement
 personnel, written or electronically recorded statements of
 witnesses, written or electronically recorded statements
 [statement] of the defendant, ([except written statements of
 witnesses and] except the work product of counsel in the case and
 their investigators and their notes or report), books, accounts,
 letters, photographs, objects or tangible things not privileged,
 which constitute or contain evidence material to any matter
 involved in the action and which are in the possession, custody or
 control of the State or any of its agencies. The order shall
 specify the time, place and manner of making the inspection and
 taking the copies and photographs of any of the aforementioned
 documents or tangible evidence; provided, however, that the rights
 herein granted shall not extend to written communications between
 the State or any of its agents or representatives or employees
 except to the extent that all or part of the communications are
 subject to disclosure under Rule 705, Texas Rules of Evidence.
 Nothing in this Act shall authorize the removal of [such] evidence
 described by this subsection from the possession of the State, and
 defense counsel shall make any inspection [shall be] in the
 presence of a representative of the State.
 (a-1)  Release of information held by a prosecuting attorney
 to defense counsel in pending or reasonably anticipated litigation
 is not a voluntary disclosure under Section 552.007, Government
 Code, and does not bar the State from asserting exceptions to
 required disclosure with respect to information released.
 (c)  The State shall supplement or amend, as necessary and
 within a reasonable period, discovery ordered under this article.
 If after the 10th day before trial begins, or during trial, the
 State discloses evidence in violation of the reasonable period for
 discovery required by this subsection and if the evidence is
 materially favorable to the defendant, the manner in which defense
 counsel uses that evidence at trial may not be considered against
 the defendant in any subsequent review of the case.
 (d)  The prosecuting attorney may redact or otherwise edit
 law enforcement reports or witness statements for good cause. If
 defense counsel intentionally violates a court order relating to
 discovery of a law enforcement report or witness statement, the
 prosecuting attorney may restrict further discovery as necessary
 under the circumstances. If as described by this subsection the
 prosecuting attorney asserts good cause or alleges an intentional
 violation of a court order relating to discovery of a law
 enforcement report or witness statement, the court, on the defense
 counsel's motion, shall hold a hearing to determine whether good
 cause or the alleged violation exists. If the court is unable to
 find good cause or an intentional violation of the court order, the
 court shall order the prosecuting attorney to grant defense counsel
 access to the redacted, edited, or restricted material or access to
 further discovery to the extent otherwise permitted by this
 article. This subsection does not prohibit the discovery of
 evidence materially favorable to the defendant.
 (e)  A district or county attorney may enter into a written
 agreement with a local criminal defense bar association regarding
 the implementation of the discovery procedures described by this
 article.
 SECTION 2.  The changes in law made by Article 39.14, Code of
 Criminal Procedure, as amended by this Act, apply to a criminal
 action for which the information or indictment was filed on or after
 the effective date of this Act. A criminal action for which the
 information or indictment was filed before the effective date of
 this Act is covered by the law in effect on the date the information
 or indictment was filed, and the former law is continued in effect
 for that purpose.
 SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2011.