Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB628

Filed
 
Introduced
1/12/11  
Out of House Committee
4/27/11  
Voted on by House
5/12/11  
Refer
2/21/11  
Out of Senate Committee
5/21/11  
Report Pass
4/11/11  
Voted on by Senate
5/24/11  
Engrossed
5/12/11  
Governor Action
6/17/11  
Refer
5/16/11  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Report Pass
5/21/11  
Enrolled
5/30/11  
Enrolled
5/30/11  
Passed
6/17/11  

Caption

Relating to contracts by governmental entities and related professional services and to public works performance and payment bonds.

Impact

This legislation impacts various existing state laws regarding public work performance and payment bonds, particularly modifying how and when bonds are required for contracts. Moreover, the bill introduces exemptions for certain procurement methods for specific governmental entities, thereby streamlining the contracting process in certain situations. By delineating these guidelines, the bill seeks to offer greater clarity and enforceability in contract management for state and local governments, potentially enhancing efficiency in public works projects.

Summary

House Bill 628, relating to contracts by governmental entities and public works performance and payment bonds, aims to amend existing procurement regulations. The bill primarily focuses on the utilization of reverse auction procedures for obtaining services related to public work contracts. Specifically, it disallows the use of reverse auction methods for contracts that require a bond, thereby emphasizing traditional competitive bidding processes to promote transparency and fairness in government procurement. Additionally, it outlines various methods through which governmental entities can enter contracts for construction and related services, ensuring they align with best value criteria.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 628 revolve around the implications of restricting procurement processes exclusively to competitive bidding. Critics argue that disallowing reverse auctions could limit innovative and cost-effective contracting approaches that may benefit governmental agencies, particularly in times of budget constraints. Proponents, however, assert that maintaining stringent guidelines on contract procurement is vital for preventing malpractice and ensuring that public funds are utilized effectively, thereby fostering a more robust accountability framework within public contracting.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.