Texas House Bill HB737

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 1/20/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/9/11
• Refer: 2/22/11
• Voted on by House: 5/15/11
• Report Pass: 5/6/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/24/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/25/11
• Engrossed: 5/15/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/16/11
• Refer: 5/24/11
• Report Pass: 5/24/11
• Enrolled: 5/26/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the East Montgomery County Improvement District.

Impact

The passage of HB 737 would empower the East Montgomery County Improvement District with broader authority to manage venues that serve community interests. By refining the legal definition of venues, the district can better plan and facilitate various civic and charitable events, thereby fostering community engagement. The bill ensures that the district can operate more seamlessly in areas such as attracting events that can generate economic benefits and enhance community ties. This aligns with broader goals of developing regional infrastructure to support public and private gatherings.

Summary

House Bill 737 pertains to the establishment and regulation of the East Montgomery County Improvement District. The bill amends existing statutes, specifically focusing on the definition of 'venue' within the context of community event facilities. This modification aims to clarify the types of facilities that can be associated with community and civic events, including arenas, stadiums, and other large venues that charge admission. The intention behind these changes is to enhance the operational flexibility of the district to manage and promote local events and facilities effectively.

Contention

While the bill may be perceived as a necessary step towards enhancing local governance and community involvement, there might be concerns about the implications of empowering improvement districts in general. Critics could raise issues regarding the oversight and accountability of such districts and how they manage public resources and facilities. Further discussions are likely to address the balance between community autonomy and the interests of the improvement district to ensure transparency and equitable access to the venues managed.