Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB862

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to placing the State Board of Education and the State Board for Educator Certification under periodic review by the Sunset Advisory Commission.

Impact

The bill's implementation would strengthen oversight of educational governance in Texas, aligning the State Board of Education and the State Board for Educator Certification with the government's accountability practices. By subjecting these boards to periodic reviews, the law aims to address potential issues related to inefficiency or redundancy, allowing for opportunities to reform or abolish entities that no longer serve a beneficial purpose. This could lead to more effective educational policies and management within the state, ultimately benefitting students and educators.

Summary

House Bill 862 aims to ensure that the State Board of Education and the State Board for Educator Certification are placed under regular review by the Sunset Advisory Commission in Texas. The bill introduces a sunset provision that mandates a review of these boards during certain intervals, thereby requiring accountability and assessment of their performance and necessity. This measure is intended to promote effective governance within the educational framework of the state by enforcing periodic evaluations of the boards' operations and relevance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 862 appears to be generally supportive, as it emphasizes the importance of accountability in state education boards. Proponents argue that the periodic review process is vital for maintaining the effectiveness of the boards and ensuring they adapt to changing educational needs. However, some opposition may exist from those who believe that frequent evaluations could lead to instability or hinder long-term planning and implementation of educational policies.

Contention

The primary point of contention revolves around the balance between necessary oversight and the potential bureaucratic overhead that could arise from periodic reviews. Critics might express concerns that the existing boards could face undue pressure to conform to changing political climates, impacting their ability to focus on educational outcomes. The challenge will be to implement these reviews in a manner that promotes accountability without stifling the boards' capacity to operate effectively and long-term.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.