Urging Congress to call a constitutional convention for the purpose of proposing a constitutional amendment that permits the repeal of any federal law or regulation by vote of two-thirds of the state legislatures.
Impact
If adopted, HCR17 could significantly affect the balance between federal and state powers. The proposed amendment would provide a mechanism for state legislatures to collectively repeal federal laws, shifting some legislative authority away from Congress and back towards the states. This potential involvement of state legislatures in federal legislative matters emphasizes a push towards local governance and could lead to a more decentralized federal system, thereby varying the implementation of laws across states.
Summary
HCR17 is a House Concurrent Resolution that urges the United States Congress to call a constitutional convention for the purpose of proposing an amendment that would allow the repeal of any federal law or regulation by a vote of two-thirds of the state legislatures. The resolution expresses concern that Congress has exceeded its legislative powers, encroaching on states' rights and responsibilities as affirmed by the Tenth and Ninth Amendments of the United States Constitution. It asserts that excessive federal debt and compliance mandates without funding represent violations of the rights of the states and their citizens.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HCR17 likely includes a mixture of support and concern. Supporters, particularly from certain conservative factions, view this resolution as a necessary step toward restoring state sovereignty and limiting federal overreach. They argue that empowering states to repeal federal laws would enhance local governance and reflect the will of the people more closely. Conversely, opponents might argue that such a constitutional amendment could lead to instability in federal law and hinder national progress, as it may allow states to overturn critical regulations that protect citizens.
Contention
Key points of contention regarding HCR17 lie in the implications of providing state legislatures with the power to repeal federal laws. Critics are concerned that this could undermine federal authority and lead to a patchwork legal landscape where laws vary drastically between states, potentially jeopardizing rights and protections established at the federal level. Supporters emphasize the need for a strong mechanism to check federal powers, suggesting that self-regulation by states is essential to maintain democracy and ensure that government remains accountable to the people.
Rescinding the automatic rescission of certain applications made by the Texas Legislature to the United States Congress to call a national convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for proposing any amendment to that constitution.
Rescinding the automatic rescission of certain applications made by the Texas Legislature to the United States Congress to call a national convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for proposing any amendment to that constitution.
Extending the deadline for the automatic rescission of certain applications made by the Texas Legislature to the United States Congress to call a national convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for proposing any amendment to that constitution.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to require that future constitutional amendments become effective only if approved by a majority of the voters in at least three-fourths of the counties of the state.
Proposing a constitutional amendment establishing the Texas Redistricting Commission to redistrict the Texas Legislature and Texas congressional districts and revising procedures for redistricting.
Proposing a constitutional amendment repealing the provision that subjects land designated for agricultural use to an additional tax when the land is diverted to a purpose other than agricultural use or sold.