Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing a federally recognized Indian tribe in a county along the Texas-Mexico international border to conduct certain gaming activity on certain tribal lands.
If enacted, HJR133 would significantly alter state laws concerning Indian gaming, providing a legal framework for the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo to benefit economically from gaming operations. Supporters of the bill argue that this change is vital for economic development in the region, potentially leading to job creation and an influx of revenue for both the tribe and local communities. The amendment is expected to pave the way for a legally recognized form of gaming that could align with similar allowances made for other federally recognized tribes in Texas.
HJR133 proposes an amendment to the Texas Constitution that would allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Indian tribe to conduct certain gaming activities on specific tribal lands, which were either held in trust or recognized as tribal lands by the United States as of January 1, 1998. This move seeks to recognize and formalize the tribe's right to gaming under state law, potentially benefiting their economic development. According to the proposal, the amendment specifically targets gaming activities that would typically be prohibited under Texas law, marking a significant change in the legal landscape surrounding tribal gaming.
The sentiment surrounding HJR133 appears to be generally positive among those who support tribal sovereignty and economic independence for indigenous communities. Proponents view the bill as a necessary step toward acknowledging the rights of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and enabling them to leverage gaming as an economic resource. However, there may be contention among those skeptical about expanding gaming in Texas, particularly regarding regulatory concerns and implications for regional demographics who may oppose increased gaming activities.
Notable points of contention surrounding HJR133 include discussions about potential regulations and controls that would accompany the gaming activities. While supporters advocate for economic opportunity, opponents may raise concerns about the social implications of increased gaming, such as gambling addiction and community impact. Furthermore, the amendment's passage would also require public approval in an election set for November 8, 2011, leading to a broader dialogue among voters about the role of gaming in producing economic benefits versus potential societal costs.