Proposing a constitutional amendment on the length of legislative terms and number of years a person may serve in the legislature.
Impact
If passed, HJR140 would have significant implications for state laws governing electoral processes and legislative representation. The increase in term length, while aimed at improving stability in government, could also lead to concerns about incumbency advantage, as longer terms may allow legislators to consolidate power and influence. Furthermore, the new limits on consecutive service are designed to foster a more dynamic political landscape by opening opportunities for new candidates. This amendment would necessitate an overhaul of current election protocols and could reshape the political culture in Texas, promoting fresh perspectives in legislative decision-making.
Summary
HJR140 proposes a constitutional amendment aimed at modifying the length of time legislators can serve in the Texas House of Representatives and Senate. The resolution seeks to change the terms of office for senators from four years to six years, and for House members from two years to four years. Additionally, it introduces limitations on consecutive service, stipulating that no individual may serve more than 12 consecutive years in the Senate or eight consecutive years in the House. These changes are intended to enhance governance by encouraging turnover and limiting the entrenched political power of long-serving legislators.
Sentiment
The sentiment following the introduction of HJR140 reflects a divided opinion among legislators and constituents. Proponents argue that the proposed changes will facilitate better governance and discourage career politicians from monopolizing power. Detractors, however, express concerns that extending terms could diminish accountability and reduce the responsiveness of elected officials to their constituents. The dialogue surrounding the bill underscores a broader debate on the balance between stability and dynamism in legislative representation.
Contention
Notable points of contention within discussions surrounding HJR140 include the potential effects of longer terms on voter representation and responsiveness. Critics worry that extending the duration of legislative service may lead to decreased engagement with the electorate, as longer-serving officials might feel less compelled to respond to constituent needs. Supporters counter that the proposed term changes would create a more experienced and effective legislature, ultimately benefiting the state. The amendment's impact on political competition and the nature of lawmaking in Texas raises critical questions about governance and accountability.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to limit the time that a person may serve as a member of the Texas Legislature or as a statewide elected officer in the executive branch to 12 consecutive years.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to limit the time that a person may serve as a member of the Texas Legislature or as a statewide elected officer in the executive branch.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to set the salaries of members of the legislature and the lieutenant governor based on the average public school teacher salary in this state.
A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.