Texas House Bill HJR28

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 11/8/10
• Refer: 2/21/11

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment requiring the legislature to establish a state gaming commission and to authorize and provide for the regulation of gaming conducted at certain locations in this state, authorizing federally recognized Indian tribes to conduct gaming on certain Indian lands, and requiring the governor to call the legislature into special session to consider gaming legislation.

Impact

If passed, HJR28 would significantly alter the landscape of gaming laws in Texas, shifting the regulatory authority to a newly established state gaming commission. Current laws prohibiting lotteries and unregulated gaming would be amended, paving the way for regulated casino operations in municipalities with populations over 675,000 and on designated islands. The amendment could potentially create new revenue streams for the state through gaming taxes while also providing gaming opportunities for Indian tribes, allowing them to operate under their jurisdictional laws.

Summary

HJR28 is a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment aimed at establishing a state gaming commission to regulate gaming activities in Texas. The amendment seeks to legitimize various forms of gaming, including casino gaming at specific coastal locations and municipalities with significant population bases. It also allows federally recognized Indian tribes to conduct gaming on specific Indian lands within the state. Additionally, the resolution requires the governor to call a special legislative session if the legislature does not act on this resolution by a stipulated deadline. This amendment aims to create a structured approach to gaming, acknowledging the complexities of both state and tribal rights.

Sentiment

The general sentiment towards HJR28 appears to reflect a mixture of support and opposition, indicative of the broader national conversation surrounding gaming and its regulation. Proponents argue that the regulated gaming framework could enhance economic development and tourism, while critics express concerns regarding gambling addiction, social impacts, and the fair treatment of local communities amidst such expansions. Discussions also encompass potential ramifications for existing gaming operations and a desire for responsible management of such activities.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HJR28 include the scope of the proposed gaming activities, the locations approved for gaming establishments, and the intended allocations of generated revenues. There are fears that, while aimed at fostering economic growth, the resolution might lead to unsustainable gambling expansion, impacting socio-economic factors negatively. Additionally, discussions hint at concerns over local communities losing control over gaming operations within their jurisdictions as the state asserts regulatory oversight.