Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HJR34

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Sent toSOS
 
Proposed Const. Amend.
 

Caption

Supporting the ratification of a proposed amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing for a balanced federal budget.

Impact

The passage of HJR34 would primarily impact federal budgeting practices by pushing for an amendment that would require the federal government to maintain a balanced budget. If ratified, this change in the Constitution would lead to significant implications for state laws and fiscal policies at both the state and federal levels. Here in Texas, the resolution allows the state to formally align with similar movements across other states, highlighting a growing sentiment nationwide around fiscal responsibility and budgetary balance.

Summary

HJR34 is a joint resolution from the Texas Legislature that expresses the state's support for a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution which mandates a balanced federal budget. The resolution aims to reinforce the idea that the federal government should not spend beyond its means, signaling Texas's desire for fiscal accountability at the national level. By advocating for this amendment, the Texas Legislature seeks to encourage stable economic governance and challenges the current trend of budget deficits at the federal level.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJR34 is largely supportive among conservative legislators and citizens who advocate for fiscal discipline. They view the balanced budget amendment as a necessary measure to curb governmental overspending and ensure that future generations do not inherit a burdensome debt. However, there are also concerns among some lawmakers and economic analysts who warn that such a stringent requirement could stifle essential government programs during economic downturns, potentially leading to budgetary challenges that could affect public services.

Contention

The main points of contention regarding HJR34 involve the feasibility and potential consequences of a balanced budget requirement. Critics argue that mandating a balanced budget might limit the government's ability to react to economic crises, as it would prohibit deficit spending even in times of emergency. Additionally, there are debates about how a balanced budget amendment would be enforced and the implications it would have on various federal appropriations, which could bring shifts in funding for crucial services and programs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.