Texas House Bill HR2731

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 5/29/11
• Enrolled: 6/3/11
• Passed: 6/3/11

Caption

Congratulating the Del Rio High School boys' golf team on winning the District 29-5A title.

Impact

If enacted, HR2731 would have significant implications for state laws pertaining to environmental regulation. The bill proposes to strengthen the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) authority to enforce existing federal laws while encouraging states to adopt more stringent measures. This could lead to a re-evaluation of state-level environmental policies, prompting them to align more closely with the federal guidelines set forth in the bill. As a result, states may need to allocate more resources to ensure compliance and monitoring of environmental standards.

Summary

HR2731, known as the Clean Air and Water Protection Act, aims to enhance regulations on pollutants discharged into the environment, targeting air and water quality across the nation. The bill emphasizes the need for stricter compliance measures and increased penalties for violations surpassing current standards to improve public health outcomes. Proponents argue that this legislation is critical for safeguarding the environment, particularly to protect vulnerable communities who are disproportionately affected by pollution-related health issues.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR2731 is generally supportive among environmental advocacy groups and public health organizations, which view the bill as necessary to address escalating environmental concerns. However, there is palpable opposition from some industries, particularly those reliant on fossil fuels, who argue that increased regulations could hinder economic growth and job creation. This divide highlights the ongoing tension between environmental stewardship and economic interests, often manifesting in heated debates during discussions.

Contention

Notable points of contention within HR2731 include the balance between environmental protection measures and economic impact on industries. Critics have voiced concerns regarding the feasibility of compliance, claiming that the bill may impose onerous requirements that outweigh potential benefits, often leading to job losses and economic strain. Supporters counter that prioritizing public health and sustainable practices ultimately leads to long-term economic benefits through improved community health outcomes and enhanced quality of life.