Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1025

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
3/30/11  
Introduced
3/1/11  
Voted on by Senate
4/7/11  
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to service of citation and appointment of an attorney ad litem for an indigent parent in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

Impact

This legislation is expected to significantly impact how legal proceedings involving parents are conducted within Texas courts. By ensuring that parents who cannot afford an attorney are provided with legal representation, the bill aims to uphold the rights of these individuals in sensitive family law matters. It is anticipated that this will mitigate the potential imbalance of power that may occur when one party is unable to secure proper legal guidance, thus fostering a more equitable judicial process in family law cases.

Summary

SB1025 aims to amend the Texas Family Code related to the service of citation and the appointment of an attorney ad litem for indigent parents in specific cases affecting the parent-child relationship. The bill introduces modifications that ensure any citation served on a parent includes vital information about the appointment of an attorney ad litem, specifically designed to assist those who cannot afford legal representation. Additionally, the bill mandates that courts evaluate claims of indigence before hearings, requiring timely action on the part of the judicial system to secure legal assistance for indigent parties.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support for its intention to provide legal assistance to those in need, there are concerns regarding the practical implementation of these measures. Critics may raise issues about the potential increase in cases handled by courts due to the mandated evaluation of indigence, which could complicate existing processes. Additionally, there may be discussions about the adequacy of resources available for appointing attorneys ad litem and whether this is sustainable under current budget constraints. As the bill moves forward, these points of contention may shape further legislative debates regarding the balance between ensuring legal representation and maintaining court efficiency.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.