Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1165 Enrolled / Bill

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    S.B. No. 1165


 AN ACT
 relating to certain enforcement powers of the banking commissioner;
 providing administrative penalties.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Section 35.003, Finance Code, is amended by
 amending Subsections (a) and (b) and adding Subsection (b-1) to
 read as follows:
 (a)  The banking commissioner has grounds to remove or
 prohibit a present or former officer, director, or employee of a
 state bank from office or employment in, or prohibit a controlling
 shareholder or other person participating in the affairs of a state
 bank from further participation in the affairs of, a state bank or
 any other entity chartered, registered, permitted, or licensed by
 the banking commissioner if the banking commissioner determines
 from examination or other credible evidence that:
 (1)  the person:
 (A)  intentionally committed or participated in
 the commission of an act described by Section 35.002(a) with regard
 to the affairs of a financial institution, as defined by Section
 201.101 [the bank]; [or]
 (B)  violated a final cease and desist order
 issued by a state or federal regulatory agency against the person or
 an entity in which the person is or was an officer, director, or
 employee [in response to the same or a similar act]; or
 (C)  made, or caused to be made, false entries in
 the records of a financial institution;
 (2)  because of this action by the person:
 (A)  the financial institution [bank] has
 suffered or will probably suffer financial loss or expense, or
 other damage;
 (B)  the interests of the [bank's] depositors,
 creditors, or shareholders of the financial institution have been
 or could be prejudiced; or
 (C)  the person has received financial gain or
 other benefit by reason of the action, or likely would have if the
 action had not been discovered; and
 (3)  the action:
 (A)  involves personal dishonesty on the part of
 the person; or
 (B)  demonstrates wilful or continuing disregard
 for the safety or soundness of the financial institution [bank].
 (b)  If the banking commissioner has grounds for action under
 Subsection (a) and finds that a removal or prohibition order
 appears to be necessary and in the best interest of the bank
 involved and its depositors, creditors, or [and] shareholders, the
 banking commissioner may serve a proposed removal or prohibition
 order, as appropriate, on a person alleged to have committed or
 participated in the action.  The proposed order must:
 (1)  be delivered by personal delivery or by registered
 or certified mail, return receipt requested;
 (2)  state with reasonable certainty the grounds for
 removal or prohibition; [and]
 (3)  state the effective date of the order, which may
 not be before the 21st day after the date the proposed order is
 delivered or mailed; and
 (4)  state the duration of the order, including whether
 the duration of the order is perpetual.
 (b-1)  The banking commissioner may make a removal or
 prohibition order perpetual or effective for a specific period of
 time, may probate the order, or may impose other conditions on the
 order.
 SECTION 2.  Subsection (b), Section 35.005, Finance Code, is
 amended to read as follows:
 (b)  In each emergency order the banking commissioner shall
 notify the bank and any person against whom the emergency order is
 directed of:
 (1)  the specific conduct requiring the order;
 (2)  the citation of each law alleged to have been
 violated;
 (3)  the immediate and irreparable harm alleged to be
 threatened; [and]
 (4)  the duration of the order, including whether the
 duration of the order is perpetual; and
 (5)  the right to a hearing.
 SECTION 3.  Subsection (a), Section 35.007, Finance Code, is
 amended to read as follows:
 (a)  Except as otherwise provided by law, without the prior
 written approval of the banking commissioner, a person subject to a
 final and enforceable removal or prohibition order issued by the
 banking commissioner, or by another state, federal, or foreign
 financial institution regulatory agency, may not:
 (1)  serve as a director, officer, or employee of a
 state bank or [,] trust company, or as a director, officer, or
 employee with financial responsibility of any other entity
 chartered, registered, permitted, or licensed by the banking
 commissioner under the laws of this state[, including an interstate
 branch, trust office, or representative office in this state of an
 out-of-state state bank, trust company, or foreign bank];
 (2)  directly or indirectly participate in any manner
 in the management of such an entity;
 (3)  directly or indirectly vote for a director of such
 an entity; or
 (4)  solicit, procure, transfer, attempt to transfer,
 vote, or attempt to vote a proxy, consent, or authorization with
 respect to voting rights in such an entity.
 SECTION 4.  Subchapter A, Chapter 35, Finance Code, is
 amended by adding Section 35.0071 to read as follows:
 Sec. 35.0071.  APPLICATION FOR RELEASE FROM FINAL REMOVAL OR
 PROHIBITION ORDER.  (a)  After the expiration of 10 years from date
 of issuance, a person who is subject to a prohibition or removal
 order issued under this subchapter, regardless of the order's
 stated duration or date of issuance, may apply to the banking
 commissioner to be released from the order.
 (b)  The application must be made under oath and in the form
 required by the banking commissioner. The application must be
 accompanied by any required fees.
 (c)  The banking commissioner, in the exercise of
 discretion, may approve or deny an application filed under this
 section.
 (d)  The banking commissioner's decision under Subsection
 (c) is final and not appealable.
 SECTION 5.  Section 35.009, Finance Code, is amended to read
 as follows:
 Sec. 35.009.  ENFORCEMENT BY COMMISSIONER [OF FINAL ORDER].
 (a)  If the banking commissioner reasonably believes that a bank or
 other person has violated any of the following, the banking
 commissioner may take any action authorized under Subsection (a-1):
 (1)  this subtitle or rules enacted under this subtitle
 and, as a result of that violation, exposed or could have exposed
 the bank or the bank's depositors, creditors, or shareholders to
 harm;
 (2)  other applicable law of this state and, as a result
 of that violation, exposed or could have exposed the bank or the
 bank's depositors, creditors, or shareholders to harm; or
 (3)  a final order issued by the banking commissioner.
 (a-1)  The [a final and enforceable cease and desist,
 removal, or prohibition order issued under this subchapter, the]
 banking commissioner may:
 (1)  initiate an administrative penalty proceeding
 against the bank or other person, in accordance with Sections
 [under Section] 35.010 and 35.011;
 (2)  refer the matter to the attorney general for
 enforcement by injunction or other available remedy; or
 (3)  pursue any other action the banking commissioner
 considers appropriate under applicable law.
 (b)  If the attorney general prevails in an action brought
 under Subsection (a-1)(2) [(a)(2)], the attorney general is
 entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees from the bank or
 person committing the violation [violating the order].
 SECTION 6.  Section 35.010, Finance Code, is amended to read
 as follows:
 Sec. 35.010.  ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY. (a)  The banking
 commissioner may initiate a proceeding for an administrative
 penalty against a bank or other person by serving on the bank or
 other person, as applicable, notice of the time and place of a
 hearing on the penalty. The hearing may not be held earlier than
 the 20th day after the date the notice is served. The notice must:
 (1)  be served by personal delivery or by registered or
 certified mail, return receipt requested; [and]
 (2)  contain a statement of the conduct alleged to
 constitute a violation; and
 (3)  if the alleged violation is described by Section
 35.009(a)(1) or (2), identify corrective action that the bank or
 other person must take to avoid or reduce the amount of a penalty
 that would otherwise be imposed under this section [violate the
 order].
 (b)  In determining the amount of any penalty to be imposed
 [whether an order has been violated], the banking commissioner
 shall consider the following factors:
 (1)  the financial resources of the bank or other
 person;
 (2)  the good faith of the bank or other person,
 including any corrective action taken;
 (3)  the gravity of the violation;
 (4)  the history of previous violations;
 (5)  an offset of the amount of the penalty by the
 amount of any penalty imposed by another state or federal agency for
 the same conduct; and
 (6)  any other matter that justice may require
 [maintenance of procedures reasonably adopted to ensure compliance
 with the order].
 (c)  If the banking commissioner determines after the
 hearing that the alleged conduct occurred and that the conduct
 constitutes a violation [order has been violated], the banking
 commissioner may impose an administrative penalty against a [the]
 bank or other person, as applicable, in an amount:
 (1)  if imposed against a bank, not less than $500 and
 not more than $10,000 for each violation for each day the violation
 continues, except that the maximum administrative penalty that may
 be imposed is the lesser of $500,000 or one percent of the bank's
 assets; or
 (2)  if imposed against a person other than a bank, not
 less than $500 and not more than $5,000 for each violation for each
 day the violation continues, except that the maximum administrative
 penalty that may be imposed is $250,000 [not to exceed $500 for each
 day the bank violates the final order].
 SECTION 7.  Section 35.011, Finance Code, is amended to read
 as follows:
 Sec. 35.011.  PAYMENT OR APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY.
 (a)  When a penalty order under Section 35.010 becomes final, the
 bank or other person, as applicable, shall pay the penalty or appeal
 by filing a petition for judicial review.
 (b)  The petition for judicial review stays the penalty order
 during the period preceding the decision of the court. If the court
 sustains the order, the court shall order the bank or other person,
 as applicable, to pay the full amount of the penalty or a lower
 amount determined by the court. If the court does not sustain the
 order, a penalty is not owed. If the final judgment of the court
 requires payment of a penalty, interest accrues on the penalty, at
 the rate charged on loans to depository institutions by the Federal
 Reserve Bank of New York, beginning on the date the judgment is
 final and ending on the date the penalty and interest are paid.
 (c)  If the bank or other person, as applicable, does not pay
 the penalty imposed under a final and nonappealable penalty order,
 the banking commissioner shall refer the matter to the attorney
 general for enforcement. The attorney general is entitled to
 recover reasonable attorney's fees from the bank or other person,
 as applicable, if the attorney general prevails in judicial action
 necessary for collection of the penalty.
 SECTION 8.  Section 35.012, Finance Code, is amended to read
 as follows:
 Sec. 35.012.  CONFIDENTIALITY OF RECORDS. A copy of a
 notice, correspondence, transcript, pleading, or other document in
 the records of the department relating to an order issued under this
 subchapter is confidential and may be released only as provided by
 Subchapter D, Chapter 31, except that the banking commissioner
 periodically shall publish all final removal and prohibition
 orders. The banking commissioner may release a final cease and
 desist order, a final order imposing an administrative penalty, or
 information regarding the existence of any of those orders [the
 order] to the public if the banking commissioner concludes that the
 release would enhance effective enforcement of the order.
 SECTION 9.  Section 185.003, Finance Code, is amended by
 amending Subsections (a) and (b) and adding Subsection (b-1) to
 read as follows:
 (a)  The banking commissioner has grounds to remove or
 prohibit a present or former officer, director, manager, managing
 participant, or employee of a state trust company from office or
 employment in, or [to] prohibit a controlling shareholder or
 participant or other person from participation in the affairs of,
 the state trust company or any other entity chartered, registered,
 permitted, or licensed by the banking commissioner if the banking
 commissioner determines from examination or other credible
 evidence that:
 (1)  the person:
 (A)  intentionally committed or participated in
 the commission of an act described by Section 185.002(a) with
 regard to the affairs of a financial institution, as defined by
 Section 201.101 [the state trust company]; [or]
 (B)  violated a final cease and desist order
 issued by a state or federal regulatory agency against the person or
 an entity in which the person is or was an officer, director, or
 employee [in response to the same or a similar act]; or
 (C)  made, or caused to be made, false entries in
 the records of a financial institution;
 (2)  because of this [that] action by the person:
 (A)  the financial institution [state trust
 company] has suffered or will probably suffer financial loss or
 expense, or other damage;
 (B)  the interests of the [trust company's]
 clients, depositors, creditors, or shareholders of the financial
 institution have been or could be prejudiced; or
 (C)  the person has received financial gain or
 other benefit by reason of the action, or likely would have if the
 action had not been discovered [violation]; and
 (3)  that action by the person:
 (A)  involves personal dishonesty on the part of
 the person; or
 (B)  demonstrates wilful or continuing disregard
 for the safety or soundness of the financial institution [state
 trust company].
 (b)  If the banking commissioner has grounds for action under
 Subsection (a) and finds that a removal or prohibition order
 appears to be necessary and in the best interest of the state trust
 company involved and its clients, creditors, [and] shareholders, or
 participants, the banking commissioner may serve a proposed removal
 or prohibition order, as appropriate, on an officer, employee,
 director, manager or managing participant, controlling shareholder
 or participant, or other person alleged to have committed or
 participated in the violation or other conduct described by Section
 185.002(a). The order must:
 (1)  be delivered by personal delivery or by registered
 or certified mail, return receipt requested;
 (2)  state with reasonable certainty the grounds for
 removal or prohibition; [and]
 (3)  state the effective date of the order, which may
 not be before [earlier than] the 21st day after the date the
 proposed order is delivered or mailed; and
 (4)  state the duration of the order, including whether
 the duration of the order is perpetual [or delivered].
 (b-1)  The banking commissioner may make a removal or
 prohibition order perpetual or effective for a specific period of
 time, may probate the order, or may impose other conditions on the
 order.
 SECTION 10.  Subsection (b), Section 185.005, Finance Code,
 is amended to read as follows:
 (b)  In each emergency order the banking commissioner shall
 notify the state trust company and any person against whom the
 emergency order is directed of:
 (1)  the specific conduct requiring the order;
 (2)  the citation of each statute or rule alleged to
 have been violated;
 (3)  the immediate and irreparable harm alleged to be
 threatened; [and]
 (4)  the duration of the order, including whether the
 duration of the order is perpetual; and
 (5)  the right to a hearing.
 SECTION 11.  Subsection (a), Section 185.007, Finance Code,
 is amended to read as follows:
 (a)  Except as provided by other law, without the prior
 written approval of the banking commissioner, a person subject to a
 final and enforceable removal or prohibition order issued by the
 banking commissioner, or by another state, federal, or foreign
 financial institution regulatory agency, may not:
 (1)  serve as a director, officer, or employee of a
 state trust company or [,] state bank, or as a director, officer, or
 employee with financial responsibility of any other entity
 chartered, registered, permitted, or licensed by the banking
 commissioner under the laws of this state while the order is in
 effect[, including an interstate branch, trust office, or
 representative office in this state of an out-of-state bank, trust
 company, or foreign bank];
 (2)  directly or indirectly participate in any manner
 in the management of such an entity;
 (3)  directly or indirectly vote for a director of such
 an entity; or
 (4)  solicit, procure, transfer, attempt to transfer,
 vote, or attempt to vote a proxy, consent, or authorization with
 respect to voting rights in such an entity.
 SECTION 12.  Subchapter A, Chapter 185, Finance Code, is
 amended by adding Section 185.0071 to read as follows:
 Sec. 185.0071.  APPLICATION FOR RELEASE FROM FINAL REMOVAL
 OR PROHIBITION ORDER.  (a)  After the expiration of 10 years from
 the date of issuance, a person who is subject to a prohibition or
 removal order issued under this subchapter, regardless of the
 order's stated duration or date of issuance, may apply to the
 banking commissioner to be released from the order.
 (b)  The application must be made under oath and in the form
 required by the banking commissioner. The application must be
 accompanied by any required fees.
 (c)  The banking commissioner, in the exercise of
 discretion, may approve or deny an application filed under this
 section.
 (d)  The banking commissioner's decision under Subsection
 (c) is final and not appealable.
 SECTION 13.  Section 185.009, Finance Code, is amended to
 read as follows:
 Sec. 185.009.  ENFORCEMENT BY COMMISSIONER [OF FINAL ORDER].
 (a)  If the banking commissioner reasonably believes that a state
 trust company or other person has violated any of the following, the
 banking commissioner may take any action authorized under
 Subsection (a-1):
 (1)  this subtitle or rules enacted under this subtitle
 and, as a result of that violation, exposed or could have exposed
 the state trust company or its clients, creditors, shareholders, or
 participants to harm;
 (2)  other applicable law of this state and, as a result
 of that violation, exposed or could have exposed the state trust
 company or its clients, creditors, shareholders, or participants to
 harm; or
 (3)  a final order issued by the banking commissioner.
 (a-1)  The [a final and enforceable cease and desist,
 removal, or prohibition order issued under this subchapter, the]
 banking commissioner may:
 (1)  initiate administrative penalty proceedings
 against the state trust company or other person, as applicable, in
 accordance with Sections [under Section] 185.010 and 185.011;
 (2)  refer the matter to the attorney general for
 enforcement by injunction or other available remedy; or
 (3)  pursue any other action the banking commissioner
 considers appropriate under applicable law.
 (b)  If the attorney general prevails in an action brought
 under Subsection (a-1)(2) [(a)(2)], the attorney general is
 entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees from a state trust
 company or person committing the violation [violating the order].
 SECTION 14.  Section 185.010, Finance Code, is amended to
 read as follows:
 Sec. 185.010.  ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY. (a)  The banking
 commissioner may initiate a proceeding for an administrative
 penalty against a state trust company or other person by serving on
 the state trust company or other person, as applicable, notice of
 the time and place of a hearing on the penalty. The hearing may not
 be held earlier than the 20th day after the date the notice is
 served. The notice must:
 (1)  be served by personal delivery or by registered or
 certified mail, return receipt requested; [and]
 (2)  contain a statement of the conduct alleged to
 constitute a [be in] violation; and
 (3)  if the alleged violation is described by Section
 185.009(a)(1) or (2), identify corrective action that the state
 trust company or other person must take to avoid or reduce the
 amount of a penalty that would otherwise be imposed under this
 section [of the order].
 (b)  In determining the amount of any penalty to be imposed
 [whether an order has been violated], the banking commissioner
 shall consider the following factors:
 (1)  the financial resources of the state trust company
 or other person;
 (2)  the good faith of the state trust company or other
 person, including any corrective action taken;
 (3)  the gravity of the violation;
 (4)  the history of previous violations;
 (5)  an offset of the amount of the penalty by the
 amount of any penalty imposed by another state or federal agency for
 the same conduct; and
 (6)  any other matter that justice may require
 [maintenance of procedures reasonably adopted to ensure compliance
 with the order].
 (c)  If the banking commissioner determines after the
 hearing that the alleged conduct occurred and that the conduct
 constitutes a violation [an order has been violated], the banking
 commissioner may impose an administrative penalty against a state
 trust company or other person, as applicable, in an amount:
 (1)  if imposed against a state trust company, not less
 than $500 and not more than $10,000 for each violation for each day
 the violation continues, except that the maximum administrative
 penalty that may be imposed is the lesser of $500,000 or one percent
 of the state trust company's assets; or
 (2)  if imposed against a person other than a state
 trust company, not less than $500 and not more than $5,000 for each
 violation for each day the violation continues, except that the
 maximum administrative penalty that may be imposed is $250,000 [not
 to exceed $500 for each day the state trust company violates the
 final order].
 SECTION 15.  Section 185.011, Finance Code, is amended to
 read as follows:
 Sec. 185.011.  PAYMENT OR APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY.
 (a)  When a penalty order under Section 185.010 becomes final, a
 state trust company or other person, as applicable, shall pay the
 penalty or appeal by filing a petition for judicial review.
 (b)  The petition for judicial review stays the penalty order
 during the period preceding the decision of the court. If the court
 sustains the order, the court shall order the state trust company or
 other person, as applicable, to pay the full amount of the penalty
 or a lower amount determined by the court. If the court does not
 sustain the order, a penalty is not owed. If the final judgment of
 the court requires payment of a penalty, interest accrues on the
 penalty, at the rate charged on loans to depository institutions by
 the [New York] Federal Reserve Bank of New York, beginning on the
 date the judgment is final and ending on the date the penalty and
 interest are paid.
 (c)  If the state trust company or other person, as
 applicable, does not pay the penalty imposed under a final and
 nonappealable penalty order, the banking commissioner shall refer
 the matter to the attorney general for enforcement. The attorney
 general is entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees from the
 state trust company or other person, as applicable, if the attorney
 general prevails in judicial action necessary for collection of the
 penalty.
 SECTION 16.  Section 185.012, Finance Code, is amended to
 read as follows:
 Sec. 185.012.  CONFIDENTIALITY OF RECORDS. A copy of a
 notice, correspondence, transcript, pleading, or other document in
 the records of the department relating to an order issued under this
 subchapter is confidential and may be released only as provided by
 Subchapter D, Chapter 181, except that the banking commissioner
 periodically shall publish all final removal and prohibition
 orders. The banking commissioner may release a final cease and
 desist order, a final order imposing an administrative penalty, or
 information regarding [relating to] the existence of any of those
 orders [the order] to the public if the banking commissioner
 concludes that the release would enhance effective enforcement of
 the order.
 SECTION 17.  Subsection (a), Section 202.005, Finance Code,
 is amended to read as follows:
 (a)  The commissioner may:
 (1)  examine a bank holding company that controls a
 Texas bank to the same extent as if the bank holding company were a
 Texas state bank; and
 (2)  bring an enforcement proceeding under Chapter 35
 against a bank holding company or other person that violates or
 participates in a violation of Subtitle A, an agreement filed with
 the commissioner under this chapter, or a rule adopted by the
 finance commission or order issued by the commissioner under
 Subtitle A, as if the bank holding company were a Texas state bank.
 SECTION 18.  The changes in law made by this Act apply only
 to conduct occurring on or after the effective date of this Act.
 Conduct occurring before the effective date of this Act is governed
 by the law in effect on the date the conduct occurred, and the
 former law is continued in effect for that purpose.
 SECTION 19.  This Act takes effect immediately if it
 receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each
 house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.
 If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate
 effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2011.
 ______________________________ ______________________________
 President of the Senate Speaker of the House
 I hereby certify that S.B. No. 1165 passed the Senate on
 March 29, 2011, by the following vote:  Yeas 31, Nays 0.
 ______________________________
 Secretary of the Senate
 I hereby certify that S.B. No. 1165 passed the House on
 May 13, 2011, by the following vote:  Yeas 138, Nays 0, one present
 not voting.
 ______________________________
 Chief Clerk of the House
 Approved:
 ______________________________
 Date
 ______________________________
 Governor