Texas Senate Bill SB1282

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/8/11
• Refer: 3/16/11

Caption

Relating to a prohibition on the use of revenue sharing as a means of repayment of Texas Department of Transportation cost participation in a toll facility of a public entity.

Impact

If enacted, SB1282 would modify existing laws related to the financial interactions between TxDOT and public toll facility operators. This change would mean that, while TxDOT can provide funding for toll infrastructure, it cannot use the generated revenues as a means of repayment from the public entities involved, potentially changing how local governments approach the funding and operation of toll roads in Texas. This aligns with an ongoing effort to reflect accountability and transparency in public funding arrangements.

Summary

SB1282 aims to prohibit the use of revenue sharing agreements as a means for the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to recover costs associated with toll facilities operated by public entities. The bill seeks to amend the Transportation Code by clarifying that while the department may participate financially in toll facility projects, it cannot use revenue sharing to recover those costs from public entities. The intent behind this legislation is to ensure a clear delineation of financial responsibilities between the state and local public entities when it comes to toll facilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1282 appears to be cautiously optimistic among proponents, particularly those advocating for local government autonomy and financial independence. Supporters believe that the prohibition on revenue sharing helps to protect public funds and ensures that local entities retain control over the financial aspects of their toll operations. However, there are concerns about the financial implications of this bill for public entities that rely on these revenues for maintaining and operating toll facilities.

Contention

Notable points of contention around SB1282 revolve around the implications for funding and infrastructure maintenance programs. Critics of the bill might argue that this prohibition could limit the financial tools available to public entities, potentially leading to funding shortfalls and challenges in managing toll facilities effectively. The balance between state interests and local governance continues to be a focal point in discussions, as stakeholders assess the long-term effects of such legislative changes on public transportation financing.