Texas Senate Bill SB1290

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/18/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/28/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/10/11
• Voted on by House: 5/25/11
• Engrossed: 4/28/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/29/11
• Report Pass: 5/3/11
• Enrolled: 5/26/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Calhoun County Groundwater Conservation District; providing authority to issue bonds.

Impact

The establishment of the Calhoun County Groundwater Conservation District will directly influence state laws related to groundwater management. The bill allows the district to set specific rules concerning the operation of water wells within its jurisdiction, ensuring permitted withdrawals align with conservation goals. Notably, the district cannot impose taxes, which could limit its funding mechanisms but is poised to operate through fees collected from well permits issued. This provision aims to foster a self-sufficient operational model for the district without burdening residents with additional taxation.

Summary

SB1290 proposes the creation of the Calhoun County Groundwater Conservation District to effectively manage the groundwater resources in the region. The bill aims to empower the district with the authority to issue bonds, impose fees for water well permits, and to provide services such as mediation between landowners affected by groundwater supply issues. By doing this, the legislation recognizes the necessity of managing groundwater due to its increasing scarcity and the need for sustainable practices in water extraction and usage.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding SB1290 may include the oversight and authority granted to the newly formed district. While proponents argue that centralized governance is vital for effective water management, opponents may see it as a potential overreach, fearing that local interests could be sidelined in favor of broader regulations. Furthermore, the prohibition on imposing taxes could lead to challenges in maintaining district operations and funding necessary infrastructure. As such, these discussions are critical in shaping perceptions of the bill and its long-term viability within the state's water governance framework.