Texas Senate Bill SB1569

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/11/11
• Refer: 3/23/11

Caption

Relating to the remediation of underground storage tanks and the fee on delivery of certain petroleum products.

Impact

The passage of SB1569 is expected to have a considerable impact on state laws concerning environmental management and public safety. By amending existing statutes and instituting a fee for petroleum product deliveries, the bill provides additional funding for remediation efforts. This change is particularly crucial for addressing contamination issues related to USTs. Furthermore, the bill empowers the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to undertake necessary corrective actions in cases where tank owners are uncooperative or untraceable, ensuring that responsive measures can be taken without delay.

Summary

SB1569 is a significant piece of legislation aimed at enhancing the remediation processes associated with underground storage tanks (USTs) and introducing a fee structure for the delivery of specific petroleum products. The bill not only clarifies the responsibilities of owners and operators of these tanks but also emphasizes the importance of preventing potential leaks and ensuring public health and environmental safety. By instituting measures for risk-based corrective actions and establishing clear protocols for site assessments, the bill seeks to effectively manage the risks posed by USTs.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB1569 appears to be supportive among environmental groups and public health advocates, who view it as a necessary step toward better managing hazardous materials and protecting the environment. However, some stakeholders have expressed concerns regarding the financial impacts of the new fees on petroleum deliveries, fearing that those costs may ultimately be passed down to consumers or small businesses.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to SB1569 include the balance between regulatory oversight and operational costs for businesses involved in the petroleum sector. Some critics argue that the additional fees could disproportionately affect smaller operators and may lead to increased prices for consumers. Conversely, proponents contend that the environmental benefits and potential for improved public safety outweigh the costs associated with the new fee structure.