Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1740

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association.

Impact

If enacted, SB1740 would significantly affect state laws related to insurance claims handling, particularly for windstorm-related damages. The amendments address issues such as the necessary 60-day notice before filing appeals, limits on the duration of actions against the association, and the creation of a more formal review process through the State Office of Administrative Hearings. This change is designed to balance the rights of claimants with the operational efficiency of the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association, ensuring timely resolution of disputes while also adhering to legal procedural standards.

Summary

SB1740 relates to the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association and modifies various provisions surrounding the appeals process for insurance claims made against the association. The bill introduces stricter timelines for when appeals can be filed, facilitating a swift resolution of claims. It also establishes a clearer framework for the process of appealing decisions made by the association, including specifying the timeline for filing appeals and requirements for written notices. Overall, the bill aims to streamline the interaction between insured individuals and the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association, potentially reducing the delays in claims processing following disasters.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be generally supportive, especially among proponents who argue that it offers necessary updates to a system plagued by inefficiencies. Supporters believe that by clarifying and expeditiously managing the appeals process, the bill will help policyholders receive their entitled benefits quicker after catastrophic events. However, there may be concerns among some stakeholders about the tight timelines, potentially limiting the ability of individuals to adequately prepare their appeals.

Contention

Notably, points of contention may arise around the stricter requirements for filing and the mandatory notice periods. Critics may argue that the requirements could disadvantage policyholders who are still grappling with the aftermath of disasters. Additionally, the stipulations set forth in the bill, including limits on claims and the expedited timeline for appeals, could provoke discussions regarding their fairness and impact on those who may need more time to navigate the complexities of the insurance system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SJ00007

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.

CT HJ00041

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims.

CT HJ00023

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner Extensions Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State.

CT HJ00038

Resolution Concerning The Disposition Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.

CA AB2009

California Travel and Tourism Commission.

CA AB1920

California Travel and Tourism Commission.

CA AB2323

Insurance: covered communications.

CT HJ00029

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.