Texas Senate Bill SB1789

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/11/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 4/29/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/5/11
• Refer: 3/23/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/19/11
• Report Pass: 4/29/11
• Voted on by House: 5/23/11
• Engrossed: 5/5/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/9/11
• Report Pass: 5/18/11
• Enrolled: 5/23/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to platting requirements affecting subdivision golf courses in certain counties.

Impact

The proposed changes by SB1789 could have significant implications for local government policies and the development of recreational land. By revising the approval mechanisms for subdivision golf courses, the bill provides clear guidelines that align with the growing demand for recreational spaces in urban areas. This move is particularly important as cities face pressures to increase green spaces and promote outdoor activities among their residents, directly affecting community planning and land use policies.

Summary

SB1789 aims to amend the platting requirements that impact subdivision golf courses in certain counties of Texas. The bill specifically targets municipalities with populations exceeding 50,000 and those located in counties with larger populations, thus establishing a regulatory framework that addresses the unique needs of such municipalities in relation to land development for golf courses. By updating the Local Government Code, the bill seeks to streamline the approval process for plats related to subdivision golf courses, which may help facilitate new development and enhancements in recreational amenities across Texas.

Contention

While the bill may promote development in recreational areas, there could be points of contention among stakeholders, especially regarding local governance and environmental considerations. Some local authorities might express concerns that loosening platting requirements could lead to overdevelopment or insufficient oversight in land use, which could impact local ecosystems. Thus, a balance must be struck between fostering development and ensuring responsible land management practices are upheld.