Texas Senate Bill SB1809

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/26/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/9/11

Caption

Relating to a study by the comptroller of public accounts of the economic impact of the Texas-Mexico border wall in the State of Texas.

Impact

The bill mandates a detailed examination of the effects on landowners, businesses, and operational entities within the specified zones near the Texas-Mexico border. The comptroller is tasked with evaluating the impact on each specific parcel of land, including how local economies might be impacted as a result of the border wall's construction and operational policies. Furthermore, the bill envisions cooperative engagement with state agencies and local governments to gather necessary data, reinforcing a collaborative approach to understanding the prospective economic landscape.

Summary

SB1809 is a legislative proposal aimed at studying the economic implications of the Texas-Mexico border wall. Specifically, the bill assigns the comptroller of public accounts the task of analyzing how the installation of the border wall affects the state of Texas, local governments, businesses, families, and individuals, particularly those whose land lies between the international boundary and the border wall itself. This analysis is intended to provide a comprehensive understanding of the socio-economic landscape as it relates to border security measures.

Contention

Discussions surrounding SB1809 highlight various points of contention. While some lawmakers and stakeholders advocate for a thorough examination of impacts before implementing significant changes to border security, others may express reservations regarding the timely execution of such studies, particularly with concerns about funding and resources. The potential financial burden on state agencies to conduct the study also brings to light questions about the efficiency and necessity of public expenditure in this context. The bill indicates an expiration date in early 2013, introducing urgency into the process, which could lead to further debate on the validity of the proposed studies amid evolving circumstances at the border.