Texas Senate Bill SB360

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 1/18/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 3/9/11
• Voted on by Senate: 3/24/11
• Refer: 2/2/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/11/11
• Report Pass: 3/9/11
• Voted on by House: 5/4/11
• Engrossed: 3/24/11
• Governor Action: 5/17/11
• Refer: 3/29/11
• Report Pass: 3/31/11
• Enrolled: 5/4/11
• Passed: 5/17/11

Caption

Relating to the composition and use of money in the rural water assistance fund.

Impact

The proposed changes are intended to enhance the capacity of rural areas to access necessary financial resources for improving their water systems. The amendments clarify the types of projects eligible for funding, including water quality enhancement and infrastructure improvement. This could significantly improve service delivery in economically distressed areas and facilitate the acquisition of rights related to water resources, aligning with the broader objectives of the state's water plans.

Summary

Senate Bill 360 proposes amendments to the Texas Water Code regarding the composition and utilization of the Rural Water Assistance Fund. The bill details the creation of a specific fund that aims to assist rural political subdivisions in obtaining financial support for various water-related projects. The fund can provide low-interest loans and grants to help with infrastructure development, including construction, acquisition, and improvements associated with water supply and sewer services essential for rural communities.

Contention

While the bill is primarily aimed at boosting rural water services, the implications of the funding mechanisms and the types of corporations eligible for assistance could lead to discussions about prioritization and the appropriate use of state resources. One notable aspect of the bill is its potential impact on nonprofit water supply and sewer service corporations, as it not only provides funding but also outlines specific criteria for eligibility. This could be seen as a positive step towards improving rural water infrastructure, although it might also raise questions about the effectiveness and accountability of how funds are allocated.