Texas Senate Bill SB408

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 3/9/11
• Voted on by Senate: 3/15/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/3/11
• Report Pass: 3/9/11
• Voted on by House: 5/20/11
• Engrossed: 3/15/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 3/30/11
• Report Pass: 4/28/11
• Enrolled: 5/29/11
• Vetoed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to inspection of and the operation of watercraft on the John Graves Scenic Riverway; providing for the imposition of a criminal penalty.

Impact

One notable aspect of SB408 is its prohibition of specific watercraft types, including airboats, fanboats, and hovercraft. The bill directs the commission to create rules for these prohibitions, while still allowing for certain exceptions such as law enforcement operations and regulated inspections. This regulatory approach reflects a commitment to preserving the scenic integrity and ecological health of the John Graves Scenic Riverway, balancing recreational use with environmental stewardship.

Summary

Senate Bill 408 aims to enhance the regulation of watercraft operations on the John Graves Scenic Riverway by imposing certain restrictions on watercraft types permitted on the riverway. The bill provides for the visual inspection of the waterway and mandates specific frequency and methods for such inspections, aiming to ensure better oversight and maintenance of the river's environmental quality. This includes both aerial inspections and surface sampling to monitor water conditions more effectively.

Contention

Debate around SB408 has highlighted concerns about the impact of stricter regulations on recreational and commercial activities. Supporters argue that these regulations are essential for protecting the riverway’s ecological integrity and providing a framework for responsible watercraft use. Critics, on the other hand, express worries about the potential economic implications, particularly for local businesses that rely on recreational boating and tourism in the area. The imposition of criminal penalties for non-compliance adds another layer of concern, as opponents fear this may lead to unnecessary legal repercussions for individuals and businesses unaware of the new rules.