Texas Senate Bill SB457

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 1/31/11
• Refer: 3/17/11

Caption

Relating to minimum efficiency standards for certain products; providing a civil penalty.

Impact

If enacted, SB457 will specifically modify existing regulations under the Health and Safety Code, introducing standards that will make certain energy-efficient technologies mandatory. The bill aims to streamline product compliance, and manufacturers will be required to certify that their products meet the efficiency standards prior to sale in the state. Additionally, requirements for product labeling and testing will enhance transparency for consumers, potentially driving a market shift towards more energy-efficient technologies.

Summary

SB457 establishes minimum efficiency standards for certain products in Texas, particularly focusing on residential pool pumps, pool pump motors, and their controls. The bill mandates the comptroller, in collaboration with the State Energy Conservation Office, to implement rules that ensure these products meet specified efficiency standards by a set deadline. It signifies an attempt to enhance energy conservation measures within the state and reduce the environmental impact of inefficient products. Enforcement mechanisms and penalties for non-compliance are also delineated to ensure adherence to these standards.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB457 suggests a focus on promoting ecological sustainability and energy efficiency among residential products. Supporters argue that implementing these standards is essential for reducing energy waste and greenhouse gas emissions, ultimately contributing to a healthier environment. However, there may be concerns from manufacturers about the costs involved in complying with new regulations, coupled with the possibility of civil penalties for non-compliance, which could lead to pushback from those apprehensive about increased operational costs.

Contention

Notable points of contention around SB457 may arise regarding the feasibility and economic implications of the mandated standards. Critics may argue that stringent regulations could impose financial burdens on small manufacturers or retailers. Furthermore, the necessity for compliance testing and the associated costs could deter some from entering or remaining in the market. The bill's proponents need to address how these regulations will be balanced with the economic realities faced by the industry while promoting the intended environmental benefits.