Texas Senate Bill SB520

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 3/15/11
• Introduced: 2/3/11
• Voted on by Senate: 3/21/11
• Refer: 2/17/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/13/11
• Report Pass: 3/15/11
• Voted on by House: 5/20/11
• Engrossed: 3/21/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/4/11
• Report Pass: 5/12/11
• Enrolled: 5/21/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the creation, administration, powers, and duties of a county assistance district.

Impact

The enactment of SB520 is anticipated to have significant implications for local governance and public service funding in Texas. By empowering counties to create assistance districts, the bill enhances local control and allows communities to make tailored decisions based on their specific needs. Moreover, the ability to impose a local sales tax offers an alternative revenue source to address funding shortfalls in essential services and infrastructure projects. It is positioned as a solution to empower communities economically, allowing for increased investment in public infrastructure and services.

Summary

Senate Bill 520 aims to establish a framework for the creation and administration of county assistance districts in Texas. Under this legislation, a county's commissioners court can initiate the formation of a county assistance district, which would serve specific public functions such as road construction, law enforcement, recreational facility maintenance, public health services, and promoting economic development. Each district has the authority to levy a sales and use tax to fund its operations, with the maximum rate set at one percent, subject to voter approval. This bill provides a structured approach for local governments to manage and fund public services effectively.

Contention

However, the bill is not without its critics. Concerns arise regarding the potential for increased tax burdens on residents, as new local sales taxes may be imposed in addition to existing taxes. Critics argue that an enhanced capacity to create such districts could lead to unequal funding and services across different regions, creating disparities between wealthier and less affluent areas. Additionally, there are apprehensions about the accountability of district governance, especially if the structure allows for the appointment of a governing body rather than direct election by residents, which may undermine local democratic processes.