Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB536 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 2, 2011      TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB536 by Davis (Relating to the use of certain discipline management practices or behavior management techniques by peace officers employed or commissioned by school districts.), As Engrossed    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  TEA estimates cost associated with reporting requirements. It is anticipated that any additional costs associated with implementation of the legislation could be absorbed within existing resources. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. The TEA assumes that school districts likely already provide information on requirements under Section 37.0021 to affected school district staff and that including district-employed police officers among those who receive this information would not present any significant administrative costs.  School districts could incur costs to update their local software systems to comply with the additional reporting requirements related to use of restraint.     Source Agencies:701 Central Education Agency   LBB Staff:  JOB, LXH, JGM, RBl    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 2, 2011





  TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB536 by Davis (Relating to the use of certain discipline management practices or behavior management techniques by peace officers employed or commissioned by school districts.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB536 by Davis (Relating to the use of certain discipline management practices or behavior management techniques by peace officers employed or commissioned by school districts.), As Engrossed

 Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education 

 Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education 

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB536 by Davis (Relating to the use of certain discipline management practices or behavior management techniques by peace officers employed or commissioned by school districts.), As Engrossed

SB536 by Davis (Relating to the use of certain discipline management practices or behavior management techniques by peace officers employed or commissioned by school districts.), As Engrossed



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



TEA estimates cost associated with reporting requirements. It is anticipated that any additional costs associated with implementation of the legislation could be absorbed within existing resources.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. The TEA assumes that school districts likely already provide information on requirements under Section 37.0021 to affected school district staff and that including district-employed police officers among those who receive this information would not present any significant administrative costs.  School districts could incur costs to update their local software systems to comply with the additional reporting requirements related to use of restraint. 

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

The TEA assumes that school districts likely already provide information on requirements under Section 37.0021 to affected school district staff and that including district-employed police officers among those who receive this information would not present any significant administrative costs.  School districts could incur costs to update their local software systems to comply with the additional reporting requirements related to use of restraint. 

Source Agencies: 701 Central Education Agency

701 Central Education Agency

LBB Staff: JOB, LXH, JGM, RBl

 JOB, LXH, JGM, RBl