Texas Senate Bill SB659

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/9/11
• Refer: 3/16/11

Caption

Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Racing Commission, the abolishment of the Equine Research Account Advisory Committee, and the authority of Texas AgriLife Research; providing an administrative penalty.

Impact

The proposed changes are designed to tighten regulatory oversight of racetracks in Texas, ensuring that all operators are compliant and actively participating in the racing industry. By establishing processes for the designation of licenses as 'active' or 'inactive,' the bill allows the Racing Commission to better monitor the status and compliance of racetrack operations. Additionally, the bill places further requirements on license holders regarding criminal history checks and authorization processes, setting a higher standard for accountability within the industry.

Summary

SB659 seeks to amend various sections of the Texas Racing Act to extend the lifespan and enhance the functions of the Texas Racing Commission. It introduces clear definitions for active and inactive racetrack licenses and establishes administrative procedures surrounding the issuance, renewal, and potential revocation of these licenses. Notably, the bill abolishes the Equine Research Account Advisory Committee while maintaining the authority of Texas AgriLife Research in overseeing equine research grants, thereby streamlining administrative processes within the racing industry.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB659 appears to be mixed, with proponents supporting the bill as a necessary step for improving the regulatory environment and ensuring that only serious operators maintain licenses. Supporters in the racing community contend that a more robust administrative framework will lead to enhanced integrity in horse racing and better resource allocation for equine research. However, some critics might view the removal of the advisory committee as a dilution of stakeholder input in the regulatory process, worrying that this could negatively affect the interests of smaller operators.

Contention

Some points of contention center around the implications of abolishing the Equine Research Account Advisory Committee, with potential concerns about diminishing oversight in equine research funding. The bill's focus on administrative penalties and compliance may be seen as overly stringent by some stakeholders within the racing community who fear that increased regulations could stifle participation, particularly among smaller racetracks struggling to comply with heightened standards. The balance between necessary regulation and operational viability remains a key point of discussion.