Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB667

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the management of groundwater resources in this state and the rights of landowners in groundwater.

Impact

The bill, when enacted, will modify existing laws to enhance the management and stewardship of groundwater resources. It shifts focus towards local groundwater conservation districts which are tasked with developing management plans that align with state objectives while accommodating local needs. The bill recognizes that the effective management of groundwater is not only essential for sustainability but also serves a compelling public interest by allowing districts to create rules that do not impede the reasonable access of landowners to groundwater for domestic and agricultural purposes.

Summary

SB667 addresses the management of groundwater resources in Texas and emphasizes the rights of landowners regarding the groundwater beneath their properties. The bill highlights the importance of quality groundwater for sustaining life, communities, agricultural production, and economic progress. It acknowledges the significant ownership interests of landowners in groundwater and asserts the necessity of reasonable regulations by the state to balance competing interests and demands for this vital resource. Furthermore, local control through the establishment of groundwater conservation districts is emphasized as the preferred method of managing these resources effectively.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB667 appears to lean toward proactive groundwater management and respect for landowner rights. Proponents of the bill argue that it will empower local management authorities to make decisions that best fit their unique geographical and hydrological contexts. However, some opponents may express concerns regarding the effectiveness of local control, fearing that it could lead to inconsistent regulations and potential inequities among landowners depending on the policies of different districts.

Contention

A notable point of contention likely arises from the balance between local control and state oversight in the management of groundwater resources. While the bill emphasizes local control, there may be concerns among stakeholders about how regulations are enforced and the potential for disparities in resource availability across districts. The provisions for groundwater use restrictions could be contentious, especially if perceived as infringing on landowners' rights to access groundwater, raising debates about the necessity and reasonableness of such regulations.

Companion Bills

TX HB1731

Identical Relating to the management of groundwater resources in this state and the rights of landowners in groundwater.

Similar Bills

CA SB193

Monterey County Water Resources Agency: Lake Nacimiento and Lake San Antonio: white bass.

CA AB1757

California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: climate goal: natural and working lands.

CA AB1044

Tule East Groundwater Sustainability Agency Act.

CA SB372

San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Groundwater Sustainability Agency.

AZ HB2095

Posting of notices; municipal websites

AZ SB1041

Groundwater savings certificate; assured water

TX HB836

Relating to the development of brackish groundwater.

CA SB963

Water replenishment districts.