Texas Senate Bill SB746

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/6/11
• Introduced: 2/16/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/12/11
• Refer: 2/23/11
• Report Pass: 4/6/11
• Engrossed: 4/12/11
• Refer: 4/14/11

Caption

Relating to membership of the state continuing advisory committee for special education services.

Impact

The impact of SB746 on state laws centers on the governance and structure of the committee responsible for advising on special education. By requiring that at least one member be a special education program director, the bill seeks to ensure that the committee's decisions are informed by direct experience and knowledge of the challenges faced by schools in delivering special education services. This aligns with broader reforms aimed at improving educational outcomes for students with disabilities.

Summary

Senate Bill 746 addresses the composition and appointment of the state continuing advisory committee for special education services in Texas. The legislation amends Section 29.006 of the Education Code, specifying that the governor appoints a committee composed of 17 members, one of whom must be a director of special education programs from a school district or a shared services arrangement. This change aims to enhance the representation of specialized knowledge and experience on the committee, thereby improving oversight and advisory functions regarding special education services across the state.

Conclusion

Overall, SB746 represents an effort to refine and strengthen the processes surrounding special education governance in Texas. By reorganizing the advisory committee's structure, the bill aims to positively affect the support and resources provided to schools and students needing special education services, potentially fostering a more collaborative and informed approach to policy-making in this critical area.

Contention

While the bill has received support for enhancing the expertise within the advisory committee, there may be contention regarding the specific appointments and the oversight power of the governor in these appointments. Critics could argue that such appointments should include more diverse representation from various stakeholders involved in special education rather than being solely at the discretion of the governor, which might limit broader participation and perspectives.