Texas Senate Bill SB882

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 3/28/11
• Introduced: 2/23/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/7/11
• Refer: 3/1/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/16/11
• Report Pass: 3/28/11
• Voted on by House: 5/20/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/28/11
• Report Pass: 5/10/11
• Enrolled: 5/21/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the filing of a copy of certain records related to the release of accused persons on personal bond.

Impact

The passage of SB882 will lead to significant changes in how records of personal bond releases are maintained. This change ensures that there is a centralized and regularly updated source of information regarding individuals who have been released on personal bonds, which could potentially aid law enforcement and other legal entities in tracking defendants' movements and status in the judicial system. By mandating the filing of these records, the bill seeks to improve accountability for the release processes and the conditions surrounding personal bonds.

Summary

SB882 formally addresses the processes surrounding the filing of records related to the release of individuals on personal bond in Texas. The bill specifically amends Article 17.42 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by stipulating that personal bond pretrial release offices are required to prepare a comprehensive record for each accused individual released on personal bond. This record must only include case numbers and is expected to be updated monthly and filed with the county court clerks in the relevant counties. Such measures aim to enhance transparency and organization within the judicial process of pretrial releases.

Contention

While the bill is primarily procedural and seems straightforward, there may be underlying tensions regarding how such changes could impact the judicial system, particularly around issues of pretrial detention and civil liberties. Critics might argue that stricter record-keeping and the requirement of a centralized database could lead to undue surveillance of accused individuals and challenge their rights, while proponents will likely emphasize the importance of maintaining public safety and efficient judicial processes. As with many legislative changes, the balance between oversight and individual rights may become a central point of debate.