Texas Senate Bill SB923

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 5/12/11
• Introduced: 2/24/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/17/11
• Refer: 3/8/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/23/11
• Report Pass: 5/12/11
• Engrossed: 5/17/11
• Refer: 5/19/11
• Report Pass: 5/20/11

Caption

Relating to creating a branch winery permit.

Impact

The introduction of the branch winery permit under SB923 is expected to streamline existing processes for wineries that seek to expand beyond their primary location. The bill sets an annual state fee of $75 for this permit and alleviates the requirement for applicants to file a bond. By enabling wineries to extend their reach, the legislation could positively influence local economies through increased tourism and related business opportunities in areas where these branch operations are established. The impact on the alcoholic beverage industry is notable, potentially leading to a rise in competition and growth in the sector.

Summary

Senate Bill 923 aims to create a new type of licensing for wineries in Texas through the introduction of a 'branch winery permit'. This permit allows holders of winery permits who also possess a federal winemaker's and blender's basic permit to operate on noncontiguous premises that are not their primary place of business. The legislation is significant in expanding the operational capabilities of existing wineries and allows them to diversify their business models by leveraging multiple locations for wine production and sales.

Contention

While the bill appears to offer numerous advantages to wineries, there may be points of contention regarding the regulation of alcohol sales and how it aligns with local laws. Critics may raise concerns about the potential for increased regulation complexities, as new types of permits could complicate the existing framework. Furthermore, discussions may emerge regarding how this change might affect small, independent wineries versus larger, established brands that could benefit disproportionately from expanded operational freedoms. Addressing these concerns will require careful consideration from lawmakers to ensure that the intentions of the bill do not disadvantage smaller operators in the industry.