Texas Senate Bill SB968

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Caption

Relating to certain costs used to fund court-appointed volunteer advocate programs.

Impact

The primary impact of SB968 on state laws centers around the introduction of these new court costs, which represent an increase in financial obligations for individuals convicted of certain offenses. By implementing these fees, the bill aims to ensure a dedicated funding stream for volunteer advocate programs that assist vulnerable populations, particularly children undergoing court proceedings. This financial model is intended to enhance the resources available for advocacy, contributing positively to the overall support structure in the state's legal framework.

Summary

Senate Bill 968 establishes new court costs specifically designated to fund court-appointed volunteer advocate programs aimed at supporting children in the judicial system. The bill introduces additional fees of $50 for misdemeanor convictions and $100 for felony convictions where a victim is found to be under 17 years of age. The funds generated from these costs will be deposited into a special account within the general revenue fund and allocated to supporting the statewide organization responsible for these advocacy programs.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards SB968 appears to be largely positive among advocates for children's rights and legal reform. Supporters argue that increasing funding for volunteer advocate programs is crucial for addressing the needs of children in the court system and that these advocates play a vital role in ensuring that children's voices are heard during legal processes. However, there may be concerns among some constituents regarding the additional financial burden placed on those affected by the bill, particularly in a criminal justice context.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB968 may arise from the additional costs imposed on individuals who may already be facing financial difficulties due to convictions. Critics could argue that increasing court costs could disproportionately impact low-income individuals, thereby putting them at a further disadvantage. Conversely, supporters might emphasize the necessity of adequately funding vital support services for children in the judicial system, thus highlighting a balance between fiscal responsibility and the protection of vulnerable populations.