Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution to provide for congressional term limits, the line-item veto, a balanced federal budget, a limit on federal debt, and the repeal of federal law by two-thirds of the several states.
If passed and ratified, SJR15 could significantly alter the framework of federal governance in the United States. Imposing term limits would aim to reduce the dominance of incumbents in Congress, potentially allowing for a more diverse representation of interests. The adoption of a line-item veto would grant the president greater control over federal spending, introducing a mechanism to eliminate what might be seen as wasteful appropriations. Moreover, establishing a balanced budget requirement and limiting federal debt would instill fiscal discipline into federal budgeting processes, potentially reshaping fiscal policies and priorities.
SJR15 is a joint resolution proposed in the Texas Legislature to request a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution. The objective of the convention would be to propose several amendments aimed at reforming congressional powers and responsibilities. Key proposals include term limits for Congress members, the introduction of a line-item veto for the president, mandates for a balanced federal budget, a limit on federal debt, and empowering state legislatures to repeal federal laws with a two-thirds majority vote. This resolution highlights concerns regarding the concentration of power and calls for checks on federal authority.
The sentiment surrounding SJR15 is largely supportive among those advocating for government reform and accountability. Proponents believe that these changes could lead to a more responsive and responsible Congress that addresses the needs of its constituents without succumbing to special interest pressures. Conversely, critics express concerns about the implications of reduced federal authority and the potential for state-level conflicts. They caution that such amendments might disrupt the delicate balance of power between state and federal governments and could lead to difficulties in governance, especially during emergencies.
Notable points of contention include the feasibility and efficacy of implementing term limits, with some arguing that experience in Congress is valuable for effective governance. There are also debates surrounding the potential unintended consequences of a line-item veto, which could lead to a greater partisan divide in budgetary negotiations. Additionally, the ability of state legislatures to repeal federal laws raises questions about the implications for civil rights and federal protections, highlighting a fundamental tension between state sovereignty and federal oversight.