Texas Senate Bill SJR33

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/3/11
• Refer: 3/16/11

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing a state video lottery system to operate video lottery games at certain horse and greyhound racetracks and providing that federally recognized Indian tribes are not prohibited from conducting games of chance on certain Indian lands.

Impact

If enacted, SJR33 would alter existing state laws concerning lotteries and gambling significantly. The proposed video lottery system would require the establishment of monitoring and licensing procedures to ensure the integrity and legality of the operations. Specifically, it mandates that video lottery terminals be owned and operated by licensed entities at racetrack locations. This centralization of control would likely streamline operations while allowing the state to keep a close watch on these terminals to prevent misuse and ensure compliance with state regulations.

Summary

SJR33 proposes an amendment to the Texas Constitution that would authorize a state-controlled video lottery system. This system would allow for video lottery games to be operated at select horse and greyhound racetracks across Texas. A significant aspect of this amendment is that it would also permit federally recognized Indian tribes to conduct games of chance on their lands. By establishing such a framework, the bill aims to create a new revenue stream for the state government, enhancing funding for various state programs.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SJR33 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that this amendment could lead to more stable funding for state programs and help boost the economy through increased tourism and entertainment opportunities. However, there are concerns about potential social impacts, including addiction issues related to gambling and a possible increase in gambling culture within the state. This duality in sentiment reflects the ongoing debate over the expansion of gambling in Texas.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential consequences of gambling proliferation in Texas. Critics of SJR33 may express fears regarding its socioeconomic implications, particularly on communities that might be adversely affected by increased gambling activities. Additionally, there may be discussions around the fairness of allowing tribal communities to operate gaming while state entities establish a lottery system, which could raise questions of equity and local control. Balancing these interests will be a significant aspect of the debate surrounding the bill.