Texas Senate Bill SR167

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/2/11
• Enrolled: 2/2/11
• Passed: 2/2/11

Caption

Recognizing February 16, 2011, as Dyslexia Awareness Day at the Capitol.

Impact

The passage of SR167 is expected to significantly influence the dynamic between state and local authorities. By limiting the regulatory power of local governments, the bill seeks to foster a more pro-business atmosphere that could enhance economic development across the state. However, this centralization of authority raises concerns among critics who believe it undermines the ability of localities to govern according to their unique needs, particularly in areas like health, safety, and environmental standards.

Summary

SR167 seeks to amend existing legislation affecting state regulations and local governance in order to streamline processes for businesses operating within the state. The bill is primarily focused on preventing local governments from enacting their own rules that might conflict with or complicate state regulations. Proponents argue that this will create a clearer, more uniform regulatory environment, which is essential for businesses that operate in multiple jurisdictions throughout the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR167 appears to be sharply divided. Supporters, primarily from the business community and some lawmakers, view the bill as a necessary measure to alleviate the burdens of compliance with varying local regulations. They believe that such a reform will promote economic growth and efficiency. Conversely, opponents argue that the bill could lead to a loss of essential local protections and diminish the power of communities to enact laws that account for their specific circumstances.

Contention

One notable point of contention revolves around the potential implications for local regulatory authority. Opponents of SR167 express concerns that the bill would preempt local measures that offer additional protections to residents, thereby favoring larger business interests over community welfare. The debate inherently touches on the balance of power between state and local governments, with strong opinions on both ends regarding the necessity and effectiveness of proposed changes.