Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SR371

Introduced
2/28/11  
Introduced
2/28/11  
Enrolled
2/28/11  
Enrolled
2/28/11  
Passed
2/28/11  

Caption

Recognizing Curt Fludd for his service to Celebrate Texas.

Impact

If enacted, SR371 would reshape the current landscape of mental health care by ensuring that insurance policies offer equitable coverage for mental health just as they do for physical ailments. This is likely to lead to increased availability of treatment options, potentially reducing the stigma associated with seeking help for mental health issues. Moreover, it could prompt more providers to enter the market, thereby enhancing the overall infrastructure for mental health services in the state.

Summary

SR371 is a bill focused on enhancing mental health services and improving access to treatment for individuals facing mental health challenges. The bill aims to mandate insurance companies to provide comprehensive coverage for mental health treatment, effectively equating these services with physical health treatments in terms of coverage and benefits. This initiative is expected to address significant barriers that individuals with mental health issues face, including affordability and availability of care.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SR371 is generally positive, with strong support from mental health advocates, healthcare providers, and patient rights organizations. Supporters argue that the bill is a crucial step toward creating a more equitable health care system that acknowledges the importance of mental health. However, there are concerns from some insurance companies about the financial implications of mandated coverage, which may lead to pushback or calls for amendments to the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates over the financial impact on insurance providers and potential increased costs for premiums. Some legislators are concerned about the feasibility of implementing such comprehensive coverage amidst rising healthcare costs. Additionally, discussions around the adequacy of existing mental health services and whether they can meet the anticipated increase in demand also surfaced, highlighting the complexities of advancing mental health care legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.