Texas House Bill HB117

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

• Filed: 11/12/12

Caption

Relating to the composition of the Texas Transportation Commission and the selection of members of that commission.

Impact

If enacted, HB117 would significantly transform state laws governing transportation oversight. The election of commission members is expected to enhance democratic control and may lead to more transparency in transportation-related decisions. The bill also sets forth provisions regarding the training and reimbursement of expenses for commission members, ensuring that they are adequately prepared for their roles and responsibilities. Such amendments are aimed at fostering a more informed body capable of managing the state's transportation policies effectively.

Summary

House Bill 117 aims to alter the composition and selection process of the Texas Transportation Commission. The bill proposes a shift from a system where members are appointed by the governor with Senate confirmation to a system where members are elected statewide. This change is designed to increase accountability and responsiveness to the public over the commission's operations and decisions. Additionally, the bill stipulates that the commission will have three members instead of the previously indicated five, thereby adjusting the governance structure of the commission.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB117 appears to be mixed. Proponents of the bill argue that elected officials are more accountable to the electorate than appointed ones, which could lead to improved governance. On the other hand, opponents may express concerns about the potential for politicizing the commission and how this change might impact long-term transportation planning. The debate reflects broader tensions regarding governance and the balance between political oversight and professional expertise in public commissions.

Contention

Notably, there are points of contention regarding the reduction of commission members from five to three. Critics argue that fewer members might limit diversity of opinion and representation in crucial transportation discussions and decisions. Furthermore, some stakeholders may raise concerns about how this newly elected commission will interact with existing legislative and executive frameworks, especially concerning funding and resource allocation. These dynamics illustrate the complexities of reforming established oversight structures in state governance.