Texas House Bill HB1307

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to rates for water service, to the transfer of functions relating to the economic regulation of water and sewer service from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to the Public Utility Commission of Texas, and to the duties of the Office of Public Utility Counsel regarding the economic regulation of water and sewer service.

Impact

The bill's primary impact would be on the administrative framework governing water and sewer service industries in Texas. By centralizing oversight under the Public Utility Commission, it seeks to consolidate functions related to rate setting, service reliability, and compliance enforcement, potentially paving the way for better financial stability in utility services. The transition is also expected to align these services more closely with public interest standards, promoting accountability among providers.

Summary

House Bill 1307 addresses significant changes to the regulation of water and sewer services in Texas. It proposes to transfer the economic regulatory authority over these services from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to the Public Utility Commission of Texas. This shift aims to streamline the regulatory process and improve efficiency in management and oversight of water resources, reflecting an ongoing effort to adapt state laws to contemporary needs in water management and deliverables.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 1307 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters who believe that restructuring will enhance regulatory effectiveness and consumer protection. Nonetheless, there remains some apprehension from stakeholders worried about the potential for increased bureaucracy or over-regulation that could stifle innovation and competition within the utility sector. Various stakeholders, including environmental groups and consumer advocates, are likely to closely monitor the bill's implementation to ensure adherence to public service standards.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about the effectiveness of a centralized regulatory body in addressing local water issues, as well as the capacity of the Public Utility Commission to manage the increased complexity of services previously under the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Critics argue that significant changes to the oversight authorities could lead to inconsistent application of regulations and potentially place consumer interests at risk, emphasizing the need for continued public engagement in the regulatory process.