Texas House Bill HB1326

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to an increase in the district court records archive fee.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1326 would have significant implications on local government budgets, particularly for counties that manage district court records. The increased fees are aimed at generating more revenue, which will directly support the costs associated with archiving and maintaining court records. This change could alleviate financial pressures faced by counties in managing their judicial administrative functions, enabling better resource allocation for services related to litigation and public access to legal documents.

Summary

House Bill 1326 aims to amend the Government Code concerning district court records archiving fees. The bill proposes an increase in the district court records archive fee that counties can impose for the filing of various legal actions in district courts. Specifically, it raises the maximum allowable fee from $5 to $40, subject to approval by the local county commissioners. This measure was introduced as a means to provide counties with the necessary funds to maintain and preserve district court records more effectively, thereby enhancing administrative efficiency within the judicial system.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding the bill indicate a generally supportive sentiment from county officials who see the fee increase as a necessary step to equip their offices with the resources needed for effective record management. However, there may be concerns from the public regarding the increase in legal costs associated with filing actions in district court, which could impact individuals and entities seeking legal recourse. The sentiment, therefore, appears to be mixed: while officials advocate for the benefits of funding, some members of the community may feel the financial burden of such increases.

Contention

Despite the support for the bill from some quarters, there may be contention related to the increased financial burden imposed on individuals filing suits in district courts. Critics could argue that raising fees may deter low-income individuals from pursuing legal action due to higher upfront costs. Additionally, there may be debates about the transparency of how the funds collected through these fees will be used, raising potential concerns regarding accountability in managing public resources for administrative law functions.